IBJNews

WellPoint lowers earnings forecast after $90M legal bill

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc., the second-biggest U.S. health insurer, said it is lowering its profit forecast for the year by 3 percent after reaching a $90 million legal settlement.

Indianapolis-based WellPoint expects to earn at least $7.57 per share for 2012 compared with its June 4 estimate of $7.80, the insurer said Friday in a regulatory filing. While the forecast includes first-quarter net investment gains of 19 cents a share, the company hasn’t estimated the investment earnings for the rest of the year.

WellPoint is the biggest seller of health plans to individuals, a market set to grow by as much as 22 million people under the 2010 U.S. health-care law. Analysts estimated the company would earn $7.71 a share, excluding some items, according to the average of 18 estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

If approved by U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt, the $90 million settlement will resolve a class-action lawsuit brought on behalf of more than 700,000 former members of Anthem Insurance Cos. Inc., lawyers for the plaintiffs said Friday afternoon.

The lawsuit, which was set for a June 18 trial in federal court in Indianapolis, arose from Anthem’s 2001 conversion from a mutual company, owned by its insured policyholders, to a public company. WellPoint is the corporate parent of Anthem.

Anthem members received nearly $2.1 billion in cash compensation as part of the conversion process to a public company, but their complaint alleged that was not the fair value of their interests.

Other policyholders elected to receive stock in the conversion, and they sued WellPoint in a separate lawsuit. Pratt dismissed that case in December, in favor of WellPoint.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hmmmm
    Policyholders and investors both lose. Now what was the argument for private companies issuing health insurance policies????

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT