IBJNews

WellPoint spends $50M to burnish brand

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

WellPoint Inc. is spending $50 million this year on branding work in an effort to burnish its image before the launch of health insurance exchanges in 2014. And it probably will spend just as much next year, too.

That’s because the Indianapolis-based health insurer expects the future purchase of health insurance to function more like online retailing than ever before, where brand name, along with price and convenience, win the day.

WellPoint’s Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans have one of the most recognizable brand names around in health insurance. But WellPoint is taking nothing for granted.

“As you think about 2014, you’re going to have to market in a more retail environment, something that this industry hasn’t had to do historically, and branding is going to become more relevant,” said Wayne DeVeydt, WellPoint’s chief financial officer, at a Sept. 10 talk with investors in New York.

Also, WellPoint has run simulation programs with more than 22,000 of its 34 million customers to test possible products it could sell on the exchanges. WellPoint has been evaluating what those customers valued the most: price, brand, doctors in the network and other factors.

Next year, WellPoint will pilot some of those exchange-like products in real-life tests, to see if consumers react the same way they did in the simulations. The exchanges, called for in the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, will be online marketplaces for insurance run by the state or federal governments.

“While simulation was done with real consumers, it’s always different when they’re actually having to make the buying decision and it’s a dollar out of their pockets,” DeVeydt said.

The reason WellPoint is taking the exchanges so seriously is that they could substantially replace the existing markets for individual and small-employer insurance. WellPoint makes more money from those customers than from large employers because it actually takes on the financial risk if the cost of individuals’ or small employers’ claims spike.

So-called “fully insured” customers make up the lion’s share of WellPoint’s profits, even though they account for only 40 percent of its revenue from non-government sponsored programs. Large employers are typically “self-insured,” and hire WellPoint only to negotiate discounts with doctors and process patients’ claims.

That will make WellPoint more vulnerable than most big health insurers when the exchanges launch in 2014. Insurers will no longer be able to charge unhealthy individuals and companies significantly higher premiums, and its overhead for those customers is now capped at 20 percent of premiums.

So to keep its profits from plunging, WellPoint must gain a big chunk of the 24 million Americans predicted to flood into the exchanges.

“You’ll see [profit] margin compression, and then you’ll offset some of that compression with the new members that are coming in to the system,” DeVeydt said. “But net-net, we believe that's the bucket that will be slightly backwards and down in year one, and then you’ll kind of grow off of that.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT