IBJNews

WellPoint spent $1.3M on federal lobbying in 2nd quarter

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc., the nation's largest health insurer based on membership, spent about $1.3 million lobbying the federal government in the second quarter mostly on the government's health care overhaul, which was approved last year that aims to eventually cover millions of uninsured people.

The Indianapolis-based insurer raised its spending on lobbying 17 percent compared to the $1.1 million it spent in last year's quarter, but lowered it 3 percent compared to this year's first quarter. WellPoint operates Blue Cross Blue Shield plans in 14 states and provides coverage for more than 34 million people.

WellPoint lobbied on issues tied to the overhaul's implementation and regulations for accountable care organizations, which are networks of hospitals, doctors, rehabilitation centers and other providers that coordinate a patient's care.

It lobbied on a new rule from the overhaul governing insurer medical-loss ratios, which measure the percentage of premiums an insurer spends on care and quality improvements. Starting this year, insurers must meet minimum medical-loss ratios or offer rebates to consumers.

The insurer also lobbied on rate reviews, taxes on the industry and exchanges, which will help people buy insurance.

Aside from the overhaul, WellPoint also lobbied on the Pharmacy Competition and Consumer Choice Act of 2011.

Besides Congress and the White House, the insurer lobbied the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the departments of Labor and Health and Human Services.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wellpoint
    Tim....you really said that? I own my own business that has been around for over 50 years and is a multi-million dollar business so you are preaching to the wrong choir about free market strategies. My FICA tax bill would probably put you in a fetal position and then add my pension expense? Fact is health rates are too high for my group's loss experience. Do you know what the means?
  • Red dog
    That is one of the benefits of living in a free market system - you have a choice. In fact if you are a bunch of health nuts try going to a self insured model , since you think everyone is getting rich off of you.
    • dmc
      dmc a don't worry who is going to pay for universal health care, it obviously won't be you. Go back to reading your Newsweek and watching your Chris Matthews.
    • Wellpoint
      DMC - we all can't be as well educated as you are. I'm in favor od the tea party, gun control and less govt control...gee that sounds like most Hoosier. Just a bunch of dumb hicks in your opinion.
    • Wellpoint
      Tracks with my goup rate increase of 25% in addition to last year's 25%. I've paid over $48,000 and when I checked with Wellpoint, the group had approx $18,000 in claims over past 2 years. That my friends is a gross profit of 62.5%. IF Wellpoint has to pay 80% of each dollar for claims, I'm confused as to why I am only costing them 37.5% and still getting stung with a hugh rate increase. Don't tell me it covers the statewide experience...our family members are marathon runners in excellent health. OBTW, I checked with ASSURANT HEALTH for a quote and they are going to same my about $10,000 this year. ______ you Wellpoint.
    • Sarcasm? Or Tea Party misinformation?
      I'm trying to determine if the two previous commenters were trying to be sarcastic, albeit without humor, or are merely repeating Tea Party misinformation. Anyone else?
    • Seems minimal
      For a company as large as Wellpoint that seems minimal to have people look out for their interests. Obama will spend 800 x this on a trip to India with the family, cooks, etc, etc. I would rather keep and pay for my private insurance, have fun with lines w/ Obamacare if you think it is so great.
    • Duh
      Why do you think it's called Obama Care?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT