IBJNews

WellPoint's 3rd-quarter profit falls, but beats analyst estimates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Third-quarter profit fell nearly 8 percent at WellPoint Inc. but exceeded the expectations of Wall Street analysts.

And the Indianapolis-based health insurer raised its profit forecast for the rest of the year, the company announced Wednesday morning.

WellPoint earned $683.2 million, down 7.6 percent from the same quarter a year ago, when WellPoint earned $739.1 million.

On a per-share basis, the results appear better because WellPoint has repurchased nearly 42 million shares in the past year, a 10-percent reduction of its shares outstanding.

In the third quarter, the company recorded per-share profit of $1.90. Excluding investment gains, the company would have earned $1.77 per share, 3 cents higher than the in third quarter last year.

Analysts were expecting $1.68 per share, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

WellPoint’s operating revenue in the quarter rose nearly 6 percent, to $15.16 billion, narrowly topping analysts’ forecast of $15.12 billion.

The company's stock was up nearly 2 percent in late-morning trading, to $68.30 per share.

"We added 169,000 medical members during the third quarter and have now grown by more than one million members on a year-to-date basis, while reducing selling, general and administrative expenses by $185 million, or nearly 3 percent,” noted CEO Angela Braly in a prepared statement.

WellPoint now provides health benefits for 34.4 million people, more than any other U.S. company.

Excluding investment gains, WellPoint expects to report full-year profit of at least $6.90 per share and as much as $7.00 per share. In July, the company set its profit forecast in a range of $6.75 to $6.90.

WellPoint’s stock price has risen 18 percent this year, with another 1-percent return from dividends.

WellPoint reported its second-strongest quarter of enrollment growth in the last three years, benefiting from the $800 million acquisition of CareMore Health Group and increases in its smaller business and senior market, said Jason Gurda, an analyst at Leerink Swann in New York.

Braly said the company was happy with the growth in its senior market and is looking to make more investment in it through acquisitions and expanding its CareMore clinics. She said WellPoint will add a dozen facilities in 2012.

“The senior business is where we’re looking to make investment, growing it both organically and through acquisition,” Braly said on the analyst conference call.

The enrollment gains include a jump of 99,000 in small-business membership, mostly from companies with fewer than a 1,000 employees, said Sarah James, an analyst at Wedbush Securities Inc. in Los Angeles. The enrollment also was boosted by 89,000 in new seniors, including 57,000 that came from CareMore, WellPoint said. The insurer bought the senior-focused clinic network in June.

“We began to get hints of enrollment gains last year,” said Thomas A. Carroll, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus & Co. in Baltimore. “I think it’s a reflection that the economy may be improving as employers begin to hire again. It looks like a good, clean quarter for WellPoint.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • That is such a shame
    I really hate to hear that they only made 682 million. They can't even pay their employees a decent salary and not to mention their own medical plan for their employees sucks!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

  2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

  3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

  4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

  5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.

ADVERTISEMENT