IBJNews

Widowed car dealer Christine Burd becomes mental health advocate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

It’s a role for Christine Burd that she likely never envisioned before Nov. 10, 2009.

That’s when her husband, Richard, with whom she operated Burd Ford, in Lawrence, committed suicide. He was 43.

Burd, who is president of Burd Ford, a mother of four, and a fixture on television commercials for the dealership, has become an advocate for mental health. She recently was appointed to the board of Mental Health America of Indiana, the state’s oldest and largest health and addiction network.

Philanthropy Christine Burd has become a mental health advocate. The owner of Burd Ford lost her husband to suicide last year. (IBJ File Photo)

“Her family’s personal story of courage will bring a new perspective to our board and help thousands of Hoosiers better understand our mission and the importance of suicide prevention,” said Stephen McCaffrey, president and CEO of MHAI.

Last month, at a mental health symposium at Union Station, Burd made her first public comments about her loss. Burd said she and Richard, who were high school sweethearts, spent upward of $8 million on a new store, which is among the largest in the region. But it opened soon before the economy collapsed. The couple saw their $1.2 million nest egg disappear in 18 months.

Burd said her husband was a devoted father, sacrificing time he could have spent with friends to be with his children. He mistakenly thought suicide was the only way out to continue to provide for them.

“He truly believed he was doing what was right for us,” she told the audience. “I wish he would have understood we needed him, not the money.”

Burd and her sons have carried on the business with help from friends and employees who’ve rallied to their support.

“I am anxious to begin advocating on behalf of Hoosiers to ensure that they receive the education, support and emotional help that they need,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT