IBJNews

Wife of man killed in fair tragedy suing Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The widow of a 49-year-old man killed by a falling stage at the Indiana State Fair plans to sue the state, her attorney said Monday.

Former Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi, who is representing the family of Glenn Goodrich, said the family has filed a tort claim notice against the state regarding intent to file a lawsuit.

The tort claim is the first to be filed following the Aug. 13 incident that claimed the lives of at least six people and injured dozens of others.

Goodrich, a security worker employed by ESG Security, died after the stage collapsed as a wind gust estimated at 60 to 70 mph toppled the roof of the stage and the metal scaffolding holding lights and other equipment. The stage collapsed onto a crowd of concertgoers awaiting a show by the country act Sugarland at the fair's grandstand.

Goodrich, who was working at the show, was critically injured in the incident and died hours later.

The tort claim was filed on behalf of Goodrich's widow, Heather, and two sons.

“This serves as the first step in the process to help Heather and her young sons obtain the resources they need to survive, as Glenn was the primary earner,” said Brizzi in a prepared statement.

Brizzi said the state has 90 days to respond to the claim.

As IBJ reported Aug. 18, Indiana caps the state's liability in accidents at $700,000 per person and at $5 million total per event, amounts that personal-injury lawyers say are too low in a situation involving so many victims.

Legal experts said that could result in several other entities aside from the state fair becoming targets of negligence lawsuits, including the designer and builder of the stage and the concert promoter.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Joe- Think about this...
    Dear Joe,

    I think you are overreacting. I agree that there must be some limit to "pain and suffering" and I certainly don't think anyone deserves something crazy like one hundred million dollars or more. Now, they completely deserve to have their family become a "millionaire" if they were killed. Think of this poor guy's family that is suing. He was the financial provider for a family of four and he's in his 40's. Lets just stick with conservative estimates that he would have worked another 20 years and made an average of at least $50,000 a year. That alone equates to a million dollars...so as you can see a million dollar payment to a family in a scenario like this is actually not that much of a windfall. Now, that's not even taking the actual loss of your loved one into account. Just the direct economic impact alone from lost wages is likely to be a million dollars or more in most cases. I would certainly hope that if I had been killed in this that my wife would be awarded that or more in a wrongful death suit. It's the right thing to do.
  • No millionaires here....
    The math will be completed later, but I do not see anyone getting rich here. The lawyers pockets will certainly get much of it. With the 5 Mil cap, and the limits on the insurances of the promoter, stage maker, and others; deduct the lawyers and medical bills, it will be lean payouts anywhere. And that is not right. This is not an overheated cup of coffee. This is a real tragedy - and these people deserve more than they will ever see. Such a shame that Brizzi will see some of this money.
  • No single fault
    They may be limited by the state fair pool, but they can go after the stage maker, concert promoter and many other programs to add to the bank. My math is right as is yours. Yours is just short-sighted.
  • Millionaire
    When the cap is $5 million...who is going to become a millionaire? 7 deaths and over 40 injured. Your math is all wrong.
  • Shame
    It is a shame that when an incident like this happens, everyone's go to move is to sue whoever they can get there hands on. It was a terrible accident and any direct expense should be covered, but a family becoming a millionaire from such a tragedy is a tragedy in itself. This isn't the lottery. I feel terrible for the injuries and deaths and especially the families, but some are just out for blood.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT