IBJNews

WOJTOWICZ: Do homework before meeting business lender

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Jean Wojtowicz

Q: I've worked with the same banker throughout the life of my 15-year-old business. I’ve had good luck and financed two expansions with the bank. The expansions were easy, partly because my banker knew my business and we had a good professional relationship. But since he retired a couple of years ago, the bank has rotated three young business lenders through my neighborhood branch. I can't keep them straight!

I don’t want to sound like I’m stuck in “the good old days,” but I appreciated being able to sit down with a banker I’ve known for a long time and talk about what I needed. Now I never talk with the same person twice. I am preparing to ask for a significant small-business loan to expand my company again. How should I prepare for the bank interview? I know I am going to meet someone I've never seen before.


A: This is a problem some banking organizations don’t consider as they consolidate branches or move people in their normal career tracks. From the borrower’s perspective, it can be frustrating to be forced to start over, telling your story every time you need something from the bank. But this is a necessary step if you want the lender to understand the opportunity you are about to present.

Obviously, the person you will meet at the bank holds the key to whether you will be able to expand your business at this time. And you may be one of several business owners who will ask this person for a loan in any given week. So you want to make it as easy as possible for him or her to decide that you and your company are worth the bank’s risk.

Look back to the times you financed previous expansions with the banker who is now retired. Before you saw him, you must have sat down with your accountant, lawyer, business partners—or whoever was relevant to the project—and written a complete business plan, secured an estimate for construction, and made sure you could generate the profits necessary to pay off the loan. Then you made an appointment with your banker and were fully prepared before you went in. After all, your banker needed to base his decision to say “yes” on facts and figures in addition to what he knew about you.

The game certainly has changed for you, but perhaps not as much as you think. (Of course, it is far more comfortable to do business with someone you know rather than a new acquaintance. It may help to remember that you were once a stranger to the banker with whom you developed a long relationship.)

When you apply for a major business loan with a banker you’ve never met, your best approach would be to be as completely prepared as possible. Do all your homework, just as you must have in past years, and have everything in order when you go to the banker’s office for that critical meeting.

You might do one thing differently: Prepare to talk in detail about your business, the plans you are making, and the reasons for expanding before you show the banker the facts and figures. Do not waste the banker’s time, but remember that you are introducing yourself as a whole person who runs a business that is important to you, your employees and your community. You must demonstrate to him or her that you and the business are more than facts and figures on paper.

And be sure to allow time for the banker to ask questions.

At this point, something might come up that you did not anticipate. For example, if this loan will be secured by real estate, you will likely need an appraisal. The bank will have a list of approved appraisers. You will need to order, and pay for, the appraisal and have it addressed to the bank. Whatever the banker’s request, follow up quickly.

When you schedule your meeting, ask for an hour, arrive and leave on time, and be courteous and professional.

_____

Wojtowicz is president of Cambridge Capital Management Corp.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT