IBJNews

WOJTOWICZ: Relief available for firms with falling real estate values

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Jean Wojtowicz

Q: When I bought my building seven years ago, my bank gave me a $1 million mortgage based on an appraised value of $1.3 million. I have made regular payments, improved the building and run a successful business. We like this location and plan to stay.

Here’s the problem: My building’s latest appraisal came in at $900,000. I was surprised, but my banker seemed not to be. I owe a balance of $800,000 on my loan. This loan had a longer amortization and a shorter term, so it is up for renewal this year. I have never missed a payment and assumed this would not be a problem, but my banker indicated that the loan no longer is within their policy guidelines and that to get it renewed I may have to pay it down by another $80,000. I don’t have that kind of money.

I’m at a loss. What can I do?

A: It won’t soften the blow, but you might want to know that you are not alone. This is a tough problem because much commercial real estate has declined in value for several years through no fault of their owners.

Your banker is right: Most banks will not loan more than 80 percent of the value of commercial property. The balance of your loan is 88.9 percent of your building’s value. It was only 76.9 percent when you took out the loan and started making payments! You may be an excellent bank customer—it sounds as if you are—but the banker sees little room to be flexible. He may have other situations like yours in his portfolio.

Help is available though the U.S. Small Business Jobs Act, signed a few months ago by President Obama. The new law allows your bank to refinance existing real estate and equipment debt through the U.S. Small Business Administration 504 loan program.

The program was previously available only for the acquisition of new/used buildings and equipment. But this recent refinancing crisis has resulted in Congress and the president authorizing the SBA to open up this program to refinance real estate and equipment debt for a limited time.

Lenders offering the SBA 504 program have begun accepting applications for 504 refinancing loans. Eligible companies must be facing balloon payments or maturities before Dec. 31, 2012, and banks can take applications for the refinancing loans through Sept. 30, 2012. You fit comfortably in this schedule.

Borrowers will be able to refinance up to 90 percent of the current appraised property value or 100 percent of the outstanding mortgage, whichever is lower, plus eligible refinancing costs. Existing 504 projects and government-guaranteed loans are not eligible to be refinanced.

This is an opton that was not available until recently. Frankly, it’s a reality check that recognizes the state of the economy. I urge you to contact your banker and suggest he look into this new way to refinance your business mortgage. If your bank backs away for any reason, you should call another banker.•

____


Wojtowicz is president of Indianapolis-based Cambridge Capital Management Corp.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

  2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

  3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

  4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

  5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.

ADVERTISEMENT