IBJNews

2013 WOMAN OF INFLUENCE: Beth T. Young

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
young-3-1col.jpg Beth T. Young (IBJ Photo/Eric Learned)

Beth T. Young served as a clerk to U.S. District Court Judge S. Hugh Dillin, practiced with Baker & Daniels and Bose McKinney & Evans, and rose to partner with Robinson Wolenty & Young.

But 30 years of law practice haven’t kept her from staying active in the sorority she joined at Indiana University, Kappa Alpha Theta.

No, she doesn’t supervise pledge week or stage car washes. She has served as a board member and financial adviser of the Beta (IU) and Gamma (Butler University) chapters while also mentoring scores of undergraduates.

“They are just incredible women who inspire me,” she said. “Seeing these women start out as freshmen and then become wonderful leaders by the time they get out of college is wonderful. Their energy is compelling. It drives me.”

As an undergraduate at IU, Young initially focused on political science.

“I had taken some econ courses,” she recalled, “and had the opportunity to study abroad in a program looking at the European economic community and the ideas behind what would become the European Union.

“When the credits came back to IU, they were listed as economics classes because, alphabetically, it comes before Poly Sci.” She realized she only needed one more upper-level economics class and, voila, a double major.

Still, she wasn’t sure where she was heading. “All of my business major friends were having wonderful interviews and, hmmm, what am I going to do? So I went to law school.”

She said the list of mentors who helped her find her way is “incredibly long. Every step of my career, I had wonderful people who have helped me along.”

And taught her to give back.

“A litigator can represent the indigent in a court setting. But I wasn’t in a court setting,” she said. A better fit for Young was the Community Organizations Legal Assistance Project/Community Development Law Center. Her work there led the Indianapolis Bar Association to issue her its pro bono service award.

“I kinda sorta have a problem saying no,” she said, noting that the causes often choose her instead of vice versa. Similarly, Young isn’t sure if she chose her specialization in real estate law or if real estate law chose her.

“It was a bit of both,” she said. “When I was at Baker, I was doing labor law and pretty quickly figured out that I didn’t enjoy litigation, which was so highly competitive. One side had to win over the other.”

At around that time, she was having children and wanted to have a more regular schedule.

“Bose had this position in real estate on the north side, and we lived there,” she recalled. “And I thought, ‘How wonderful. Litigators can’t control their schedules. Real estate lawyers can.’ So I interviewed and got the position … and then found out that I still had to stay late because closings weren’t quite as predictable as I had imagined.”

But she did appreciate that, rather than try to win cases, she could focus on solving problems.

“You zealously represent your client,” she said, “but both sides are trying to get the transaction done. I like that aspect better.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT