IBJNews

2012 WOMAN OF INFLUENCE: Charlotte Lucas

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Executive Vice President, Lucas Oil Products

Sphere of Influence: She’s half of the husband-and-wife team that runs Lucas Oil, a high-profile car products company with far flung business interests and important investments in local professional sports.
 

lucas-charlotte-15col.jpg (Photo courtesy of Lucas Oil)

Charlotte Lucas says she’s an executive vice president of Lucas Oil Products. And then she laughs and says: “But I’m not sure what of. I think it’s just keeping (her husband) Forrest going and keeping him on schedule.”

That’s a formidable task, but Charlotte Lucas has been by her husband’s side since he started visiting mostly mom-and-pop truck stops to sell the oil and additives he created. Now, their privately held company, which they founded in 1989, brings in annual revenue of $150 million, according to Forbes magazine and the company’s website.

When they met, she was a single mom running a hair salon on her front porch in Taswell, Ind., and he was a trucker driving through town. “I needed the money,” she said, “and he needed a haircut.”

In the early days of Lucas Oil, when the company’s staff consisted of two Lucases and one salesman, Charlotte took care of the paperwork, billing, receiving, shipping and whatever else needed to be done. When Forrest attended trade shows, she’d fly in and join him at the last minute because “somebody had to man the phones while he was traveling, and that became part of my job, too.”

Lucas Oil grew into a well-known commodity in truck stops and auto parts stores. But it became a household name in 2006 when the Lucases agreed to a 20-year, $122 million deal to buy the naming rights for the new home of the Indianapolis Colts. That deal, she said, has been well worth the money.

Charlotte Lucas hasn’t worked in the office for a while, but she’s still working, traveling with Forrest and helping with the company’s public image. They do a lot of personal appearances “to make sure we’re remembered.”

“It’s hard work,” she said. “I don’t care if it’s a fun event. We still work. Although we do enjoy ourselves, you’re still working because you’re still promoting your company and yourself and showing people that you are what you say you are. We don’t want anybody to remotely think we’re not the hard-working, honest people that we are. Because if you’re not honest in business, you’re not anything.”

When she’s not doing Lucas Oil business, Charlotte is likely spending time with family. The Lucases married in 1982—he had five children from his previous marriage, she had one. They had one child together, Morgan, who’s a race car driver, and now have 17 grandchildren and 18 great-grandchildren. (Forrest’s youngest son from his first marriage, Greg, died in 1997 at 35.)

She said she’d like to do more traveling. But the Lucases are busy tending to the many enterprises they own, including race tracks, a TV production company, the cable television network they bought (and are rebranding as American Real) and, of course, the oil business.

“I wish I could get Forrest to relax a little more, but he is an entrepreneur through and through,” Charlotte said. “He gave me a two-week European vacation about six years ago for Christmas. We haven’t done it yet. He loves what he does and he works hard at it. But we’ll take it one of these days.”•

_____

Click here to return to the Women of Influence landing page.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT