2013 WOMAN OF INFLUENCE: Sherry Seiwert

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
seiwert-1-15col.jpg Sherry Seiwert (IBJ Photo/Eric Learned)

When the search committee for Indianapolis Downtown Inc. went out hunting for a new president, it scoured the country—only to find its ideal candidate in its own back yard.

As executive director of the Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority, Sherry Seiwert was managing a staff of 90 with an annual operating budget of $14 million and a project budget of more than $500 million. And that job was only the most recent in a series of positions that took her in and out of the political world, always with a focus on metropolitan development.

“I actually worked at the IBJ right out of college working on the lists of top whatevers in industries,” Seiwert said.

She didn’t care for that work, but better gigs quickly followed. She worked for Mayor Bill Hudnut in his Department of Metropolitan Development, where she oversaw contract work with neighborhood development groups. One had just lost its director and, even though it had little money, she accepted an offer, became a staff of one, and focused on the area around 30th Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard for five years.

“It’s very difficult being surrounded by such disinvestment day in and day out,” she said, but it made her more sympathetic to urban issues.

“That,” she said, “is where I really got started.”

Mayor Stephen Goldsmith asked her to come back to city government, and she accepted. Six years later, she gained more of a national perspective working for the Local Initiative Support Corp., a community development organization. Next stop was the state.

And now, IDI.

“A downtown is the strength of a city,” she said. “As long as downtown is thriving, our neighborhoods can only benefit.”

She strives to get beyond buzz terms like “quality of life” and “tactical urbanism” into tangible results. She’s been instrumental in developing Velocity, a five-year plan that has involved more than 4,000 people. It will be completed and presented in November. She hopes to implement some of its “quick wins” as soon as 2014.

“As people move downtown, there could be a lot more amenities. For instance, there’s not really a downtown park to take your kids—we have lots of green spaces, but they aren’t very activated.”

She’s eyeing University Park, just north of the federal building. She thinks the park could use a water element—or maybe bocce ball.

“We want people to ride their bikes downtown, but there aren’t public rest-rooms. It could be as simple as that.”

She finds the roots to her public service interest in her father, a Tipton County judge.

“I spent my summers working in different capacities as an intern around the county building. Watching my father give back in his role certainly influenced my decisions.”

As for her own impact, Seiwert serves on multiple boards, with an emphasis on those that work with the homeless (including Back on My Feet and the Coalition for Homelessness Intervention and Prevention). Even so, she is modest to a fault about her influence.

“I play kickball and dodgeball and drive a Harley,” she said. “I don’t have any illusions about impacting anyone’s life.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...