Women of Influence Nomination Form


Who are the most influential women in metro Indianapolis?

On October 31, 2014, Indianapolis Business Journal will spotlight some of our city's most successful business women from both the public and private sectors while revealing the triumphs and challenges that have shaped their careers. These powerful women will be honored at a breakfast, and profiles of the winners will be featured in a special supplement to be published November 3.

You can help us identify who should be recognized by considering women within your own business or those on not-for-profits boards on which you serve.

The deadline for nominations is September 12, 2014.


We're looking for women who:

are influential in their company or industry.

have a solid reputation within their company or industry based on their experience, integrity and leadership.

have a track record of accomplishment.


Questions? E-mail Patty Johns at pjohns@ibj.com or call (317) 472-5319.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Please address the following categories


 






 
Enter the nominee's first name.
Enter the nominee's last name.
Enter the nominee's company.
Enter the nominee's address.
Enter the nominator's city.
Enter the nominator's state.
Enter the nominator's zip code.
Enter the nominee's e-mail address.
Enter the nominee's e-mail address.
Enter the nominee's phone number.
Enter the nominator's first name.
Enter the nominator's last name.
Enter the nominator's company.
Enter the nominator's address.
Enter the nominator's city.
Enter the nominator's state.
Enter the nominator's zip code.
Enter a phone number.
Enter the nominator's relationship to the nominee.
Enter the nominator's E-mail address.
 
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT