IBJNews

Zionsville voters approve tax bump for school system

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Zionsville voters passed a referendum Tuesday night that will hike local property taxes to provide additional school funding.

The referendum will increase the local school tax to 24.44 cents per $100 of assessed value, which equates to an extra $239 per year for a $200,000 home.

The referendum carried about 57 percent of the vote.

The Zionsville School Board recently voted to cut what amounts to 17 full-time positions to help close a $2.5 million budget shortfall, but some of those jobs could be saved by the additional funding.

Zionsville voters in November 2010 rejected a similar measure that would have increased the tax rate 29.5 cents, resulting in the layoffs of 21 teachers and counselors.

Meanwhile, Johnson County taxpayers south of Indianapolis  voted no Tuesday on a referendum to decide whether to help finance a $30 million project to construct a new library in downtown Franklin, as well as renovate existing library buildings in Franklin and White River Township.

The library system wants to issue bonds to finance the project, which would be mostly funded by an increase in the property-tax rate of about 4 cents per $100 in assessed valuation.

The 70,000-square-foot library in downtown Franklin would include a two-level, 250-car parking garage.

The 20-year bond issue would cover roughly $25 million of the cost. The library would contribute $1.4 million, and the Johnson County Redevelopment Corp. would provide $3.5 million to help fund construction of the parking garage.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • The article is wrong on amount.
    Unless my math skills are off - 24.44 cents on every $100 would mean 244.44 dollars per 100K. Or, for a 200K house, about $488.88. And for the average new house in Zionsville of 350K, it's a tax increase of $855.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

ADVERTISEMENT