IBJNews

'12 worst year for life sciences since 1990s

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

To understand why Indiana’s life sciences entrepreneurs are frustrated with the flow of venture capital, look no further than this statistic from a recent PricewaterhouseCoopers report: 2012 was the slowest year for first-time life sciences investment since 1995.

Nationwide, venture capital deals for life sciences companies totaled 779 last year, down 7 percent from 2011. Total investment came to $6.6 billion, a 14-percent decline from the year before. That was the lowest level of life sciences investment since 1998.

Indiana generally followed those trends, with life sciences deals falling to five in 2012 from six the year before. Total life sciences investment in the state fell 11 percent, to $24.2 million.

“As the number of new funds being raised continues to shrink, venture capitalists are being more discriminating with where they’re willing to place new bets,” Tracy T. Lefteroff, global managing partner of the venture capital practice at Pricewaterhouse, said in a report issued this month. “At the same time, they’re holding on to reserves to continue to support the companies already in their portfolio. Both factors are taking a toll on the amount of capital available for young startups, which is reflected in a 38-percent drop in the number of seed-stage companies receiving VC dollars in 2012.” 

Steve Hourigan, president of Elevate Ventures in Indianapolis, said those trends have made it nearly impossible for his organization to find co-investment partners on early-stage life sciences companies.

Elevate manages the Indiana 21st Century Research & Technology Fund on contract with the state. The organization has been criticized by life sciences entrepreneurs for backing away from life sciences companies in favor of IT and other kinds of businesses.

Indiana continues to run significantly behind its Midwestern neighbors in total life sciences venture capital raised.

Minnesota, typically the Midwest’s behemoth for life sciences companies, recorded 14 deals last year for a total of $138.9 million. Those totals were well below the state’s 2011 performance, when 28 companies attracted $220.8 million in life sciences venture capital.

The number of deals also slipped in Ohio, to 31 last year from 35 the year before. But total life sciences venture capital shot up 97 percent to $181.9 million.

Michigan also saw big gains, with 27 companies attracting $97.7 million last year, up from 11 deals the previous year that attracted $27.9 million.

In Illinois, the number of deals dropped to 10 last year from 15 the previous year. But those 10 deals brought in $165.8 million, a 17-percent increase from 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT