IBJNews

'12 worst year for life sciences since 1990s

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

To understand why Indiana’s life sciences entrepreneurs are frustrated with the flow of venture capital, look no further than this statistic from a recent PricewaterhouseCoopers report: 2012 was the slowest year for first-time life sciences investment since 1995.

Nationwide, venture capital deals for life sciences companies totaled 779 last year, down 7 percent from 2011. Total investment came to $6.6 billion, a 14-percent decline from the year before. That was the lowest level of life sciences investment since 1998.

Indiana generally followed those trends, with life sciences deals falling to five in 2012 from six the year before. Total life sciences investment in the state fell 11 percent, to $24.2 million.

“As the number of new funds being raised continues to shrink, venture capitalists are being more discriminating with where they’re willing to place new bets,” Tracy T. Lefteroff, global managing partner of the venture capital practice at Pricewaterhouse, said in a report issued this month. “At the same time, they’re holding on to reserves to continue to support the companies already in their portfolio. Both factors are taking a toll on the amount of capital available for young startups, which is reflected in a 38-percent drop in the number of seed-stage companies receiving VC dollars in 2012.” 

Steve Hourigan, president of Elevate Ventures in Indianapolis, said those trends have made it nearly impossible for his organization to find co-investment partners on early-stage life sciences companies.

Elevate manages the Indiana 21st Century Research & Technology Fund on contract with the state. The organization has been criticized by life sciences entrepreneurs for backing away from life sciences companies in favor of IT and other kinds of businesses.

Indiana continues to run significantly behind its Midwestern neighbors in total life sciences venture capital raised.

Minnesota, typically the Midwest’s behemoth for life sciences companies, recorded 14 deals last year for a total of $138.9 million. Those totals were well below the state’s 2011 performance, when 28 companies attracted $220.8 million in life sciences venture capital.

The number of deals also slipped in Ohio, to 31 last year from 35 the year before. But total life sciences venture capital shot up 97 percent to $181.9 million.

Michigan also saw big gains, with 27 companies attracting $97.7 million last year, up from 11 deals the previous year that attracted $27.9 million.

In Illinois, the number of deals dropped to 10 last year from 15 the previous year. But those 10 deals brought in $165.8 million, a 17-percent increase from 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT