IBJNews

  • Home

'12 worst year for life sciences since 1990s

J.K. Wall
February 11, 2013
Keywords
Health Care & Insurance, Health Care & Life Sciences, Life Science & Biotech, Small Business, Startup, Venture Capital
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

To understand why Indiana’s life sciences entrepreneurs are frustrated with the flow of venture capital, look no further than this statistic from a recent PricewaterhouseCoopers report: 2012 was the slowest year for first-time life sciences investment since 1995.

Nationwide, venture capital deals for life sciences companies totaled 779 last year, down 7 percent from 2011. Total investment came to $6.6 billion, a 14-percent decline from the year before. That was the lowest level of life sciences investment since 1998.

Indiana generally followed those trends, with life sciences deals falling to five in 2012 from six the year before. Total life sciences investment in the state fell 11 percent, to $24.2 million.

“As the number of new funds being raised continues to shrink, venture capitalists are being more discriminating with where they’re willing to place new bets,” Tracy T. Lefteroff, global managing partner of the venture capital practice at Pricewaterhouse, said in a report issued this month. “At the same time, they’re holding on to reserves to continue to support the companies already in their portfolio. Both factors are taking a toll on the amount of capital available for young startups, which is reflected in a 38-percent drop in the number of seed-stage companies receiving VC dollars in 2012.” 

Steve Hourigan, president of Elevate Ventures in Indianapolis, said those trends have made it nearly impossible for his organization to find co-investment partners on early-stage life sciences companies.

Elevate manages the Indiana 21st Century Research & Technology Fund on contract with the state. The organization has been criticized by life sciences entrepreneurs for backing away from life sciences companies in favor of IT and other kinds of businesses.

Indiana continues to run significantly behind its Midwestern neighbors in total life sciences venture capital raised.

Minnesota, typically the Midwest’s behemoth for life sciences companies, recorded 14 deals last year for a total of $138.9 million. Those totals were well below the state’s 2011 performance, when 28 companies attracted $220.8 million in life sciences venture capital.

The number of deals also slipped in Ohio, to 31 last year from 35 the year before. But total life sciences venture capital shot up 97 percent to $181.9 million.

Michigan also saw big gains, with 27 companies attracting $97.7 million last year, up from 11 deals the previous year that attracted $27.9 million.

In Illinois, the number of deals dropped to 10 last year from 15 the previous year. But those 10 deals brought in $165.8 million, a 17-percent increase from 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT