IBJNews

$1.5M plan to salvage Di Rimini nears finish line

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The bank that owns the hulking pile of code violations known as Di Rimini at the southeast corner of Capitol Avenue and St. Clair Street expects to invest more than $1.5 million to finish the ill-fated project.

Louisville-based Stock Yards Bank & Trust, which last year took ownership of the vacant 31-unit apartment building at 733 N. Capitol Ave. after foreclosing on a $2.8 million loan, is working on a final round of city permit approvals that could allow construction to resume this year.

de rimini building 15colThe bank that owns the Di Rimini building hopes to resume construction this year. (IBJ Photo)

The city's Department of Code Enforcement is reviewing a permit application after the bank's proposed aesthetic fixes won approval in theory from the Department of Metropolitan Development under Regional Center design guidelines, DCE spokesman Al Ensley said.

DMD would give final sign-off after code enforcement blesses the project, a move that could happen at a hearing Feb. 6. City officials in August granted a minor zoning variance involving the building's height.

A land-use attorney representing the bank, Bingham Greenebaum Doll partner Mary Solida, hung up on a reporter after saying she could not comment. A bank spokesman did not immediately return a phone call.

Stock Yards told city officials months ago that it would have to spend $1.5 million bringing the structure up to code, DMD spokesman John Bartholomew said, though that figure likely has risen.

The bank is proposing several fixes, including adding brick to first-floor facades, lighting at each first-floor entrance, glass doors and canopies for first-floor entrances, a new stair tower clad in brick, improved landscaping and changing leasing-office space to retail. It would also have to invest in major improvements to the interior, including problems with handicap accessibility, to pass code enforcement.

The city ordered construction to stop in October 2010 after code enforcement and planning department officials discovered developer Jeff Sparks was building an entirely different structure than the one for which he had sought approval.

Despite the order, the owners began moving tenants into the building, leading the state's fire marshal to issue an emergency order barring occupancy. Violations of the Indiana building code included a lack of fire walls between apartment units or a working sprinkler system.

Michael Osborne, president of Near North Development Corp., worries the city will let the bank cut too many corners out of sympathy for the money it stands to lose on the deal. His group, which first voiced concerns over Di Rimini, opposes Regional Center approval for the project.

"A huge issue is the precedent that is set by compromising standards now. It was not the bank's fault, but it was a debacle," Osborne said. "To say, 'you made it half-way to the finish line, that's good enough.' That's not the kind of precedent you want to set. This is very much about not just this project, but the standard for the community and expectation for future projects as well."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • New Home For Sparks
    I say they force that sleeze developer Jeff Sparks to live in this turd for the rest of his life. What's he up to now anyway? Selling used cars? (Oh, well here's a shocker. According to Linkedin he is - with Andy Mohr.)
  • It's the bank's fault, Osborne
    "It was not the bank's fault, but it was a debacle," Osborne said. Of course it's the bank's fault. They had a note, which is a contract. That note gave them the legal ability to demand performance. They didn't. In fact, they were negligent in protecting their own interests as well as the interests of surrounding property owners. Of course it's their fault, at least indirectly. Who is this Osborne clown, and why is he speaking if he doesn't understand B Law 101?
  • Great writing
    "...hulking pile of code violations..." I love that.
  • just adding to the mess
    It will be just another area for trash to hang out in this area of downtown. There is enough crap in this area already, let's not add to it. What about the 4-5 story vacant bldg near this one, how about we do something with that too while we are at it.
  • And by "salvage"...
    I hope they mean "tear the mess down and start over."

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT