IBJNews

Troubled Di Rimini apartment building closer to opening

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A controversial downtown Indianapolis apartment building that never opened due to severe design deficiencies is a step closer to being ready for tenants after city officials granted the project’s new owner a zoning variance.

Louisville-based Stock Yards Bank & Trust took ownership of the 31-unit Di Rimini project at 733 N. Capitol Ave. this year after foreclosing on a $2.8 million loan to the developer.

The building, which violated height regulations, was granted a variance Tuesday to allow encroachment into the so-called sky exposure plane at the corner of St. Clair Street and Senate Avenue.

Next up is an Aug. 23 meeting of the Metropolitan Development Commission’s regional center hearing examiner, where exterior fixes to the building will be considered. Because the building is within the city’s Regional Center overlay district, the project needs to comply with certain urban design guidelines.

The bank is proposing several fixes, including adding brick to first-floor facades, lighting at each first-floor entrance, glass doors and canopies for first-floor entrances, a new stair tower clad in brick, improved landscaping and changing leasing-office space to retail. It would also have to invest in major improvements to the interior to pass code enforcement.

The city ordered construction to stop in October 2010 after code enforcement and planning department officials discovered developer Jeff Sparks was building an entirely different structure than the one for which he had sought approval. Despite the order, the owners began moving tenants into the building, leading the state's fire marshal to issue an emergency order barring occupancy.

Violations of the Indiana building code included a lack of fire walls between apartment units or a working sprinkler system.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Aesthetics?
    It looks like a prison. Perfume on a pig...
  • It Is Being Remodeled
    Cap Ave Neighbor, the city will only allow the apartment building to be remodeled if the bank pays for millions of dollars of renovations to the exterior and interior both to bring the building up to code and to greatly improve the aesthetics of the building. There is nothing being "rubber stamped," as you allege.
  • Rubber Stamp?
    Shame on the City if that "thing" is allowed to be inhabited! That thing will be a badge of municipal dysfunction for the next 30 years.
    • GO AFTER THE PERSONAL GUARANTEE!
      I agree. It should be destroyed. Hopefully that is the last thing this developer gets to build.
    • Raze It
      That building is absolutely hideous. It looks like a kid drew it, and someone constructed it. It has no place in this neighborhood, or any, for that matter. I seriously doubt that any of the cited "improvements" are going to help this blighted structure.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Doug Henning!

      2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

      3. Magician and illusionist!

      4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

      5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

      ADVERTISEMENT