IBJNews

Adjunct instructors organize at IUPUI

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Mark Harper holds a doctorate in literature. But the two or three classes he teaches each semester at IUPUI earn him less than he makes three nights a week as a bartender.

That’s because Harper is an adjunct instructor. He gets paid $2,475 per course, with no benefits and no guarantee of work the next semester.

“It’s a schizophrenic existence,” said Harper, 45. “The job dependability of a bartender right now is higher than the job dependability as an adjunct.”

adjuncts Leslie Weaver, an adjunct instructor at IUPUI, teaches elementary composition. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Such part-time faculty is essential to allow IUPUI to teach all of its 29,000 students. Part-timers account for one in every four instructors at the downtown Indianapolis campus.

They also are a growing percentage of instructors at Ivy Tech Community College and similar schools around the country, which are increasing their use of adjuncts to help them absorb a surge of displaced workers at the same time the recession has forced state governments to cut funding.

But there are two problems with such prevalent use of adjuncts. First, there’s a common perception that adjuncts, on the whole, reduce the quality of instruction at universities. Accreditation committees that verify the quality of universities have warned both IUPUI and Ivy Tech that they’re using too many.

Second, it’s not clear that adjuncts will always accept low levels of pay, security and benefits, and appreciation. At IUPUI, a group of adjuncts has already begun to agitate for improved conditions.

The Associate Faculty Advisory Board at IUPUI held a week-long “Teach In” last week, with instructors such as Harper showing his students a video of IUPUI adjuncts describing their work.

The group hopes that if more people at IUPUI know the contributions of adjuncts and the low pay and amenities they receive, things will improve.

“We need full-time faculty on our side. We need students involved, too,” said Tracy Donhardt, president of the Associate Faculty Advisory Board. Donhardt, a former reporter for IBJ, has taught journalism at IUPUI for several years as an adjunct. She is not currently an adjunct because she is finishing a master’s degree there.

The board began last year in IUPUI’s School of Liberal Arts, where there are 168 adjunct instructors. But in the fall, the board plans to add members from all of IUPUI’s schools, where there are a total of 979 part-time instructors.

The adjuncts’ organizing already has had some effect. Adjuncts in IUPUI’s liberal arts school have complained for years about the lack of work space. The liberal arts adjuncts share 23 cubicles in a room in IUPUI’s cramped Cavanaugh Hall.

But in February, IUPUI found a separate room where adjunct instructors could at least have a private meeting with a student, if necessary. Bill Blomquist, dean of the IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, said he’s contemplating how IUPUI could free up more work space for adjuncts.

“They really thought through their issues,” he said of the adjunct faculty board. He added, “As long as we can work on what is feasible, then I think we can work it out.”

Budget pressures

AdjunctWhat is not feasible, in Blomquist’s eyes, is raising adjuncts’ pay—even though the Indiana University campus in Bloomington pays adjuncts about twice as much as IUPUI does.

First, there’s the problem of declining state funding. In December, the state cut funding for Indiana University campuses by a collective $58 million. Even before the cuts, state funding per student had been declining for years as IUPUI’s enrollment surged.

“The pay issue is the most challenging right now,” Blomquist said. “We’re not increasing anybody’s pay.”

In addition, the Associate Faculty Advisory Board solicited quotes from health insurers to create a plan for adjuncts. But the IU human resources department nixed the plan, saying all benefits—even though adjuncts receive none—must come through human resources.

But perhaps the biggest obstacle for adjuncts to get better pay and benefits is their abundance. For three decades, the number of newly minted Ph.D.s in the liberal arts has outstripped available jobs—by a long shot.

Increasingly, critics say universities are selling fairy tales to graduate students.

Earning a doctorate takes as long as 10 years, during which graduate students subsist on low pay as teachers of undergraduates or research assistants to tenured professors. Then, because the number of doctorates without faculty jobs keeps piling up, finding a job seems more and more like playing the lottery.

On top of that, IUPUI taps many Indianapolis professionals—such as lawyers or journalists—to bring their real-world experience to the classroom.

“It’s not just about demand for part-time faculty, it’s also about the supply,” Blomquist said. “We are fortunate in Indianapolis to have a lot of talented folks in our community who enjoy the opportunity to teach part time, and who benefit our students.”

It’s not surprising, then, that Blomquist says he rarely struggles to find enough adjuncts to cover the liberal arts classes IUPUI offers. The only time he does is if it’s in a particularly popular foreign language—such as Arabic—or if the need arises days before the class begins.

In Donhardt’s eyes, there’s always money, it’s just how IUPUI chooses to spend it. She hopes raising awareness yields change, but she acknowledges adjuncts might have to unionize to get their demands met.

“We don’t want to go down that road anytime soon,” she said, but “we might have to.”

Things are different at Ivy Tech, where 77 percent of all instructors are part-time adjuncts. The institution constantly struggles to find enough adjuncts to teach all the classes students want, said Don Doucette, Ivy Tech’s provost.

“There are some places in some fields where we can’t find enough adjuncts,” Doucette said. English, math and computer science are some examples.

“We need qualified adjuncts all the time. And we look for them all the time,” he added.

Relying on adjuncts

IUPUI and Ivy Tech both use many times more adjuncts on their faculties than the 5 percent used at the Indiana University campus in Bloomington and the Purdue University campus in West Lafayette.

Both schools want more full-time faculty—although that’s proved easier said than done.

It’s a common assumption that full-time professors are better teachers than adjuncts. A 2004 study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research concluded that adjuncts actually had a small positive impact on instruction in scientific and professional fields but a small negative impact in the humanities.

Teresa Lubbers, Indiana’s commissioner of higher education, said she’s happy with the quality of instruction at IUPUI, even with its higher proportion of adjuncts. Her only concern with the use of adjuncts is that they rarely have as much contact with students outside the classroom as full-time professors do.

That’s particularly an issue for Ivy Tech. It struggles to have enough full-time faculty to sit on faculty governance committees, set curriculum standards and advise students—critical activities in which adjuncts don’t participate.

Ivy Tech’s accreditation body has counseled the school to lower its dependence on adjuncts. Doucette said Ivy Tech’s aspiration is to have about 66 percent of its faculty be adjuncts—but it has no clear plan right now to get there.

For IUPUI, its reliance on adjuncts also has prompted repeated admonishment from its accreditation body—in reports dating back to 1982. Just before its last accreditation review in 2002, IUPUI did start to act.

It grew its full-time faculty 30 percent from the fall of 2000 to the fall of 2008, adding nearly 760 full-time positions. But then the recession kicked in. By fall 2009, more than 150 of those positions had disappeared.

IUPUI’s percentage of full-time faculty now stands at 24 percent, down 1 percentage point from a decade ago.

That means, for the foreseeable future, most IUPUI freshmen will continue to be taught by people like Mark Harper—well-trained but poorly paid, juggling a second job and sharing a desk with scores of other adjuncts.

“We’re sort of the students’ first exposure to college life,” Harper said. “If they don’t do well in our class, then they’re not going to do well in the rest of their classes.” •

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Adjuncts and Unions
    A survey report sponsored by the American Federation of Teachers in 2010 documents the hardships being endured by part-time and adjunct faculty across the nation. More at:

    http://wjmc.blogspot.com/2010/04/are-unions-courting-adjunct-faculty.html

    Thanks for the opportunity to comment...
  • Need more information
    If you really have walked through the Campus Center, you'd notice that there is not free-flowing money as the theatre on the bottom level is yet to be completed. The floors are a quality issue and re-do with the installer.
  • Resurfacing Floors More Important than Fair Wage
    Deans and administrators say there is no money for a fair wage because of the state budget cuts. Just walk into the new Student Center, though, and amazingly, there seems to be plenty of money to re-surface the floors for the second time even though the building is not even two years old. IUPUI needs to straighten out its fiscal priorities. Are perfectly finished floors more important to the students than the quality of their education, the well-being of their instructors and the reputation of their university?
    • Squeezing Employees AND Students
      The State kicks in only 17% of IUPUI's SLA budget; the rest comes from student tuition dollars.
      Business and professional communities decry graduates' inability to write and speak effectively (not just IUPUI grads - the complaint reaches across the country and across disciplines - a chemist who can't coherently communicate his research findings? a med student who can't write a grant proposal?).
      Yet where do students learn those essential skills? In the Liberal Arts. What's the most underfunded school on campus? Liberal Arts.
      Take a long, hard look at ourselves? We do. All of us. Every day we scrape by not just in our paychecks, but in the classroom.
      A long, hard look at how IU parcels out $$$ might be a good idea too.
    • IUPUI capitalizing on economy
      Yes there was an approximate 6% cut from the state, and IU as a whole has a record of being very fiscally responsible. Therefore, a 6% cut has very little, if any, actual impact on the university's budget. Yet they are exploiting this small cut as well as the economy in general by squeezing employees, asking them to do more work for less pay and denying even cost-of-living increases for 2 years, while giving full-time faculty within the School of Medicine 10% bonuses! And the goal of the university, according to McRobbie, is to hire as many full-time faculty as possible, while cutting back on all other positions. Hopefully, they will someday realize that they are woefully mistreating the backbone of the university. Shame on you, IU!
    • be a trailblazer IUPUI
      The compensation and career ladders of adjuncts are a national problem, more pronounced in some parts of the country and at some schools than in others. The numbers in terms of dollars and cents is staggering. These are lost dollars in state, local, and national coffers. Universities need to take a long, hard look at themselves. Can they? I applaud IUPUI for bringing these issues out into the open and for IBJ for giving this the attention it deserves. I also applaud your dean for speaking on the record. Since when is the "status quo" enough for universities? Are they/we so lacking in vision and innovation? Be a trailblazer, IUPUI. Show those at neighboring institutions and across they country how it can be done.
    • Correction to above
      The fact Blomquist will not budge on pay is moot, it's much cheaper than to raise pay NOW THAN it would have been to pay instructors a fair wage from the beginning.
    • Priorities
      The fact of the matter is that IUPUI has been underpaying their adjunct instructors since adjunctships were first used. The fact Blomquist will not budge on pay is moot, it's much cheaper than to raise pay not that it would have been to pay instructors a fair wage from the beginning. This is about priorities, not budget. The university gets millions of dollars from the state and much more from tuition, and paying adjuncts a few hundred more per class is a drop in the bucket. Stop using the cuts and the crisis as an excuse for insultingly low pay at IUPUI. I hope that adjuncts cancel as many classes as needed to make up your short changing manners. Or protest with a day of no teaching. Have you at IUPUI administration seen that film "A Day Without a Mexican"?--bad film, but makes a good point. You get what you pay for Dean Blomquist!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

    5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

    ADVERTISEMENT