IBJNews

Agency blames caseworker turnover on pay, scrutiny

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana's Department of Child Services on Wednesday blamed a combination of low pay and job stress stemming from media coverage of the agency for an increasing turnover rate among child caseworkers.

DCS Chief of Staff John Ryan accused Indiana media outlets of singling out caseworkers for criticism, though he didn't provide examples. Scrutiny of the department has grown in the last year as newspaper investigations have detailed numerous child deaths.

"It's perfectly OK to criticize the department," Ryan told members of the State Budget Committee. "When you start to criticize family case managers individually, that gets to them."

Turnover among caseworkers increased from 17 percent last year to 19 percent, according to the department's annual report submitted Wednesday to the committee, which includes lawmakers and officials from the governor's administration.

The annual report makes the same statement that media coverage of the department hurt morale, but makes no mention of individual caseworkers being targeted.

The South Bend Tribune was among the newspapers reporting on the agency. DCS in March lost its court fight against the newspaper to keep details of a May 2011 call to the state's child abuse hotline secret. The call detailed abuse in a South Bend home where 10-year-old Tramelle Sturgis was beaten to death last November.

DCS spokeswoman Stephanie McFarland pointed to a story about Sturgis' death as an example of the media targeting individual caseworkers. However, the Tribune story did not include the name of that caseworker.

Ryan told the panel that along with media coverage, low pay was cited in anonymous employee surveys as a top reason they were leaving the agency. Starting pay for caseworkers, he said, is at about $33,500.

"How much more than that would make a noticeable difference in retention?" asked Budget Committee Chairman Jeff Espich, R-Uniondale.

Ryan said a 10-percent increase would help. He estimated his agency spends about $60 million annually on caseworker salaries.

Ryan's arguments on Wednesday mirror similar criticism that Gov. Mitch Daniels made at a meeting of DCS employees, where he accused the media of distorting the agency's troubles.

DCS has suffered through state budget cuts like most other state agencies in the last few years. The department was cut by $100 million in the 2011 budget, and cut by $16 million in the 2012 budget.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Case Workers
    So many parents are so totally broken or are using behavior changing drugs, that they abuse and neglect their kids. It's impossible for any government agency to keep track of every person who goes off the deep end. Maybe you would like to have a low paying job that requires you to put your life in danger every day? The stress must be unbearable. If we could only know exactly what goes on inside of every parent's home, maybe we could remove endangered kids before their own PARENTS kill them.
  • You're Kidding - Right?
    The media did it! Are you kidding me? Now I am guessing that transparency is too intrusive when it comes to certain government agencies. As for the salary issue, it was well defined in the initial job description, along with the requirements for the job. If a salary increase is required, perhaps the agency could refer to it as "media intrusion allowance pay" and the job description can point out that the enemy is statewide media personnel. I apologize to all, I would have thought of improved communication training for department personnel before blaming outside agencies that just ask tough questions.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT