IBJNews

Airport authority trims executive ranks in cost-cutting move

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Airport Authority has eliminated three executive positions, a move its board president says reflects a return to a more conventional and efficient corporate structure.

“You never like to do this but we need to streamline,” said President Michael Wells.

Wells didn’t like the executive structure put in place by former airport CEO John Clark, whose three-year contract wasn’t renewed in March.

Since Clark’s departure, interim CEO and airport veteran Robert Duncan has been reorganizing the way the airport is structured as it faces financial challenges

IBJ reported May 12 that the airport recorded a $31.3 million operating loss in 2011 due in part to airline restructuring, a sluggish economy and debt costs from the $1 billion midfield terminal project.

The three executives eliminated were Mark Hedegard, senior director of business development; Mark Kratky, controller; and Patzetta Trice, chief communications officer.

Duncan, in a memo to airport employees, said the changes were part of a process to ensure “that our organizational structure was efficient and supported our goal of reducing bureaucracy and refocusing on our core aviation mission.”

“With these changes, the chief communications officer, senior director of business development and the controller are no longer positions within the IAA organization,” he said.

Wells said the executive-level communications post wasn’t necessary. Trice, who was hired in 2005, is well known in community circles and had worked previously for Indianapolis-based Allison Transmission Inc.

Kratky's duties will be handled by existing staff.

Hedegard, a former Simon Property Group executive hired in 2010, had extensive retail experience. The airport will broaden the business development position to include economic development and responsibilities in working with surrounding counties and municipalities. The new post being created will also further revenue development from such operations as parking.

Parking generated $39 million last year, up 1 percent, and is the second-largest revenue generator at the airport, trailing only the $50.3 million from terminal revenue, which fell 2 percent.

Wells, president of real estate company REI Investments, was appointed in January by Mayor Greg Ballard, who wasn’t satisfied with the pace of development at the airport.

Wells and Duncan want more action on redeveloping the former terminal and in generating revenue from other sources.

The midfield terminal, which opened in 2008, added nearly $40 million a year to the airport’s debt service. The airport’s operating income was dinged further by a $44 million depreciation charge on the new terminal in 2011.

.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Who should I call now?
    I was about to call Hedegard to open a business in the airport- who will handle his responsibilities in the interim? For all of you naysayers; the new airport is beautiful and upscale. Stop with your complaining and enjoy Indy as a hidden gem in the midwest!
  • Idea for Mr Wells
    Maybe they should have sold the naming rights to the new airport terminal, instead of giving it away for nothing to honor some obscure politician.

    Rolls Royce Terminal sounds nice, and $10 million a year licensing fee sounds pretty good right now.
  • Good Investment
    The old airport terminal was a complete dump that was a patchwork of "fixes" over the decades with a confusing and frustrating maze of roads leading to it.

    The new airport terminal is well worth it.

    It is the first and last impression anyone coming from any real distance remembers of our community.

    It is an essential service that is used everyday, unlike the $750 million football stadium.
  • New Airport Waste of Money
    The new airport was a waste of money and it was a "legacy" project for Bart Peterson. BAA, the former airport operator, did a complete study showing that if the airport spent $275 million on the old terminal, the airport would be better positioned for the future, financially. Bart Peterson and Melina Kennedy felt differently and with the help of Patrick Dooley, then airport director, they set out in spending the money to build the new terminal. No taxpayer money is used to operate the airport, but we all pay for the new and old airport facilities through higher fees.
  • YEP, COMPLETE WASTE OF $ NO DIRECT FLIGHTS ANYWHERE
    New airport, new Lucas Oil Stadium, expanded convention center, $30,000,000 Pacer gift, Stupid City Way Project, Broad Ripple Parking Garage $ Giveaway, Money blown on lethal bike lanes. The list is endless..

    We have complete morons in City Government with grafter buddies sitting in the wings also stealing parking meter revenue. Go to www.adavceindiana.com and read about Chicago Parking Meter Corruption.

    It's all theft of taxpayer resources and complete lack of financial stewardship and devoid of integrity.

    I would just like for basic city services please.
  • Wasn't Needed
    While I am usually all for shiny new things, the new airport was not needed and a huge waste of taxpayer money. Everytime I drive past the old airport on my way to the new one it angers me! Less convenient & more expensive is never a good combination.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT