IBJNews

Airport Borders store on bankrupt chain's hit list

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis International Airport officials could know by next week whether the Borders bookstore inside the terminal will survive a third round of store closures tied to the chain’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

The Ann Arbor, Mich.-based company closed three central Indiana locations as part of the reorganization following its Feb. 16 filing. In February and March, it targeted more than 200 “underperforming” stores for closure—about 30 percent of its business.

This month, the company identified another 51 stores it may be forced to liquidate to meet terms of an agreement with its lenders, including the Indianapolis airport location. Many of the stores on the list are among the most profitable in Borders’ portfolio or have the most affordable rent, the company said in a June 9 U.S. Bankruptcy Court filing.

“The liquidation of these stores may not maximize their value for the benefit of creditors and will result in a significant loss of jobs,” the petition said.  

Borders Group Inc. said it is still negotiating to extend the deadline, but without an agreement would have to begin store-closing sales by June 22 to avoid default on the terms of its credit agreement.

Jerry Wise, the airport’s treasurer and retail director, said there is high demand for the space currently occupied by Borders, leaving the airport with options if the store closes.

A different brand of bookstore is one possibility, he said, but the retail space also could be used for another purpose. Still, Wise said bookstores tend to be very successful at airports. Indeed, Indianapolis International has seven such shops.

“Customers can still fill that need” if Borders leaves, he said.

Borders already closed stores in downtown Indianapolis, at the Shops at River Crossing near the Fashion Mall and in Carmel. It also has locations in Castleton, Greenwood and Noblesville.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • no more borders
    Just today I unsubscribed from the many emails notices I receive from borders. Then they asked me to complete a survey. They wanted to know why I don't want the emails, then why I don't expect to shop there. I had to check "other" and specify "you closed the store." Could they be surprised?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT