MARCUS: Airport conversations reveal concerns

Morton Marcus
September 18, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

The main waiting area at the “new” Indianapolis airport is a comfortable space. Even though it is a huge cavern, there is a remarkable personal scale that is missing from most airports. The management wisely limits announcements to a minimum and provides no noticeable music. There are a variety of eating/drinking establishments and a surprising selection of quality retail shops.

As I wait for a friend to arrive on a delayed short hop from Chicago, I occupy myself overhearing the cell phone conversations of others. This is not snooping nor is it difficult since most cell phone users project their voices for the hard-of-hearing as far as Pittsburgh.

“No, Naomi, it’s not true, no matter what you heard,” says a well-modulated woman out of my line of sight. “I don’t care what they are saying in Indy, Bloomfield is not about to privatize its parking meters around the square.”

“Listen to me, Henry,” implores a gentleman who is wearing a jacket and tie, unlike every other man in the waiting area. “It’s the best he can do for Indiana. He wants to stimulate our economy, but there’s not really much a governor can do. So he’s running for president.

“I’m not joking, Henry. Mitch is putting himself out there for the Republican nomination in 2012 in order to bring money to Indiana. There will be investigating reporters, pollsters and publicists parading from Munster to Madison. They’ll invest in pork tenderloins in Portland and Princeton. They’ll seek a pattern in the state’s economy over the past seven years that they can attribute to the governor.”

“I know what I know,” says a man sitting behind me. “Ever since Terre Haute was named the City of the Year, investors have been all over the town. I’ve heard the Chinese intend to buy Terre Haute. Existing private property will be retained, but governments will sell all their assets to a consortium from Shanghai.”

Without waiting for that conversation to end, I take a walk around, inspecting but rejecting the $3.75 blueberry muffin offered by a local vendor. Refreshed by my self-denial in the cause of thrift, I sit in earshot of a young blond.

“Yes, Mother,” she intones with the semi-sarcasm of a recently emancipated teen. “No, Mother. I am trying to get back to Phoenix. [Pause] No, I will not spend the night with Aunt Magna in Shelbyville. [Pause] Yes, if necessary, I’ll find a room at an airport hotel. [Pause] Bye, Mother. Please, don’t call me until tomorrow; I can take care of myself.”

No sooner does she say these words than the young woman turns to me and asks, “Is there a hotel here at the airport?”

“No,” I say. “Not yet and I hope never.”

“That’s a shame; I could use one. Why never?” she queries.

“There are plenty of rooms at several hotels just a few minutes from here,” I answer. “They were very convenient to the old airport entrance. There’s no reason to use the valuable land at the airport for new hotels that will drive out existing facilities nearby. Why not seek those enterprises that prosper near airports and add to the success of the airport itself? This is a grand opportunity for Indianapolis to demonstrate good land management.”

She looks at me as if I’m an out-of-focus 3-D movie.

“Appropriate land use,” I insist passionately, “is key to our future as a metropolis. Central Indiana is at a critical point in its development and must carefully examine its allocation of land.”

I don’t know what triggers it, but she grabs her things and leaves suddenly. It’s the story of my life.•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now