Airport makes more executive changes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Six months after terminating five executives in what was described as a $650,000 cost-cutting move, the Indianapolis Airport Authority is again shuffling upper-level positions.

Mark Hedegard, former senior vice president of development at Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group, has been named director of business development, the airport announced Monday. Hedegard will oversee parking, property development and retail operations.

Tapped as the airport’s general counsel is Joseph Heerens, currently chief legal council for Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels.

In addition, the airport has shuffled responsibilities of Robert Duncan, who previously served as chief operating officer. The 38-year airport veteran will now fill the role of special advisor to airport director John Clark. His duties will include strategic development and implementing projects, including reuse of the old airport, land acquisitions,
and revenue diversification.

Replacing Duncan as COO is Mike Medvescek, who most recently was head of airport operations.

Clark was hired as CEO last year and had been head of Jacksonville’s airport. He replaced John Kish, who left to head a municipal stadium project in Evansville.

“We have a new senior team in place that will begin taking action toward executing our strategic plan,” Clark said in a prepared statement.

A key part of the plan is to stoke development of airport land holdings, including the former passenger terminal.

The airport authority terminated seven employees, including five execs, in August as part of its efforts to cut expenses amid declining airport revenue.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!