Indianapolis airport traffic jumped in April

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For the last year, Marsha Stone has been the bearer of bad news to the Indianapolis Airport Authority board of directors.

Month after month, board members braced themselves as the airport finance director broke down the bottom-line results of plunging passenger traffic—down 8.5 percent in 2009—stemming from the Great Recession.

But at Friday morning’s meeting Stone wasn’t clad in figurative black, hooded robe or carrying a sickle.

“I am very excited to stand before you today with a presentation I’ve been waiting to talk about for some time—and that’s positive numbers in terms of passenger growth,” she said. "We’re really pleased to see April’s passenger results come out with a 6-percent increase over the same period for the prior year."

More than 319,000 people boarded a plane at the airport in April, a 6.4-percent rise from April 2009. It was the first year-to-year monthly increase since July 2007.

“We’ve been waiting for the turnaround," Stone added. "We hope it’s the start of a new trend.”

Other numbers weren't quite as positive.

Year-to-date traffic at the airport is down 1.4 percent. Scheduled seating capacity is off 3.7 percent this year because airlines are cutting flights, but that’s in the ballpark for other midsize airports, Stone said.

Cargo traffic was flat last month, said Stone, who’d been tracking an uptick in previous weeks.

Most of the cargo at the airport, the eighth-largest for cargo in North America, is moved by FedEx.

In other airport developments,  it was disclosed at Friday's board meeting that the authority is closer to adopting an incentive-based compensation package for officers. The intention is to further motivate officers to find ways to reduce costs and drive up airport revenue.

CEO John Clark already has an incentive component on top of his $270,000 annual salary. Clark has potential to earn a bonus of up to 30 percent of his base pay—or up to $81,000.

Alex Azar II, chairman of the authority’s human resources committee, said Clark recommended that his pay should remain flat in 2010, citing ongoing financial challenges at the airport.

Azar said it was “much to our CEO’s credit” to make the recommendation “in light of the financial issues we’ve been dealing with” and employee sacrifices.

Last year, his first in Indianapolis, Clark received an incentive payment of about $33,000 on top of his base salary, according to airport records.

Clark was criticized in his previous post as head of Jacksonville’s aviation authority for his salary, perks and worldwide travel expenses.

Clark has defended his travel as a part of his previous position as head of the North American arm of Airports Council International.

His time sheets are the subject of scrutiny by a Florida state’s attorney. Clark has denied any impropriety.


  • Numbers Throughout the Month
    I'd like to see the breakdown of passengers throughout the month. I wonder if by hosting the NCAA tournament, numbers were higher at the beginning of the month or if there was balance throughout.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.