IBJNews

Alternative energy firm eyeing New Castle plant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Washington, D.C.-based alternative energy company has signed a letter of intent to use an idled plant in New Castle to produce wind turbines as part of a national energy program.

State Rep. Tom Saunders, R-Lewisville, who announced the agreement on Wednesday, said nearly 1,800 jobs could be created within the next two years.

The D’Arcinoff Group would use the plant to manufacture components and as a training facility for a wind turbine-manufacturing program called Advantage Wind Turbines.

In June, D’Arcinoff said it ultimately could create 20,000 jobs in Indiana by manufacturing its green-energy supply system somewhere in the state. The firm’s potential purchase of the plant could be the first step in accomplishing the goal.

D’Arcinoff has applied for a loan from the Export-Import Bank of the United States and is awaiting a reply on whether funding for the plant will be granted. The company expects a decision within 60 days.

The job-creation plans would provide an economic boost for the New Castle area. Plymouth, Mich.-based Metaldyne Corp. last summer closed the plant, which it bought from Chrysler Corp. in 2003. The Chrysler supplier was the largest employer in New Castle.

“Although this is only a step in what could be a potentially long process, and nothing is guaranteed, the news of [D’Arcinoff] wanting to bring jobs and invest back into the Metaldyne plant in New Castle is great news,” Rep. Saunders said in a prepared statement.

Nationally, D’Arcinoff has said it could employ more than 100,000 people to manufacture, operate and service its turbines. The company also is considering locating operations in Delaware, Illinois, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, New York and Ohio.

D'Arcinoff wants to build wind turbines to generate electricity for Europe and provide synthetic fuel to the aviation industry using equipment from empty manufacturing plants.

D’Arcinoff’s plan counts on producing 30,000 wind turbines a year, 10 times the number produced by Denmark-based Vestas the world’s largest maker of wind turbines.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT