IBJNews

American Legion challenges Indiana smoking ban

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An American Legion post in northeastern Indiana has asked a federal judge to put a hold on a statewide smoking ban set to take effect Sunday.

Indianapolis attorney Scott Barnhart filed the lawsuit on behalf of American Legion Post 243 in Ligonier, 40 miles northwest of Fort Wayne, in U.S. District Court on Thursday. The lawsuit contends the smoking ban is too vague and violates the equal protection clause of the state and federal constitutions. It seeks a preliminary injunction preventing the state from enforcing the ban.

State attorney general's office spokeswoman Erin Reese said the office had not yet seen the lawsuit. She said the office will file a response at the appropriate time.

Gov. Mitch Daniels signed Indiana's first statewide smoking restrictions in March after the addition of compromises expanding the number of exemptions helped it narrowly clear the state Senate. The law exempts Indiana's bars, casinos, retail tobacco shops and private clubs, such as American Legion posts.

But the new law also says facilities that permit smoking can't host events at which children will be present. The lawsuit says the post in Ligonier has about 20 children in the facility each week and between 25 and 50 people per day are usually at the post.

The post recently spent $917 on an air-cleaning device, and it has "dramatically improved" the air quality in the building, the lawsuit says.

The post contends the law is too vague because it encourages arbitrary enforcement and because it fails to describe with "sufficient particularity" what an individual or entity must do to satisfy the law. The lawsuit also says the law violates the equal protection clause of the constitution because the fraternal group has been "irrationally singled out and is intentionally treated differently from gambling facilities."

Finally, the lawsuit contends the law violates the state's freedom of conscience provision, saying it interferes with the post members' individual decision to smoke or not.

The lawsuit seeks attorneys' fees and costs and any other relief, as well as a permanent injunction against the law.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Smok
    We are trying to rid our post of smoke. Less than 25% smoke, but 100% are forced to breathe the noxious chemicals. Our sponsored high school ROTC is no longer allowed in our post. Smoke is deterring new members and unless prohibited will eventually ruin our organization.
  • Smokers logic?
    It is not oppresive, it is a law forcing smokers to show a little common courtesy! Do you smoke around your grandchildren or children? And why? You don't want THIER lungs ruined! Well I don't wany mine ruined either! Take it outside!
  • Legion smokers
    The American legion has been around nearly 100 years and us non-smokers have tolerated your smoke with no recourse what-so-ever! Now the shoe is on the other foot for less than 2 months and ya cry like babies, what gives?
  • Your property rights
    The state seems to accept the loss of personal property rights pretty well. I suppose the common view is that this only affects smokers, however when has government ever Not expanded on the infringement of Liberties once we give up the basics. We allowed through this legislation the Government to classify Private Buisinesses as Public Property, get ready for the rest of the regulations.... its just a matter of time now. We gave it to them.
  • My Hats off to you!
    Hey look, the veterans who fought for our freedom in the armed services are still fighting for our freedoms. My hats off to all veterans and especially the members of this Legion who are fighting against this oppressive law!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

    2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

    3. Straight No Chaser

    4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

    5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

    ADVERTISEMENT