IBJOpinion

HETRICK: An anniversary wish that all could be blessed by one

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Bruce Hetrick

Four years ago this week, on an icy Valentine’s night, I walked down the grand staircase at the Indiana Repertory Theatre, met my bride halfway, and stood before our friend John, whom we’d chosen to officiate at our marriage ceremony.

There’d been a massive winter storm the day before, but despite the treacherous roads and bitter winds, people came from Chicago and Virginia, Bloomington and Fort Wayne, Broad Ripple and Avon.

After a brief introduction, Jennie DeVoe and Nicole Proctor sang The Beatles’ “Here Comes the Sun.” Considering the weather, and where we’d been in our lives, the closing verse seemed especially apropos:

Little darling, I feel the ice is slowly melting.

Little darling, it feels like years since it’s been clear.

Here comes the sun.

Here comes the sun.

And I say, it’s all right.

After the song, John spoke of marriage:

“This moment tonight is not just for them. It is also for us,” he said. “All of us are called to love and to be in loving relationships. We are called to celebrate and to enrich the special bonds that form among those we know and those we come to love.

“If you are here tonight with your spouse or a partner or among family and friends, let this ceremony be a reminder and a rededication of your own loving bond. Let this space and this ceremony remind us that love is ever-present in every way if we are simply open to see it. Let this space and this ceremony reaffirm the incredible truth that we are all connected. Let this space and this ceremony cause us to remember that love and commitment are not about producing obligations, but rather for providing opportunities. Love and marriage are not about rules—they are about expansion and self-expression.”

I write this column from the back porch of a cottage overlooking Grace Bay on the island of Providenciales in Turks and Caicos.

In the spirit of “long cold lonely winters” and slowly melting ice and “Here Comes the Sun,” we’ve traveled here for each of our anniversaries. It’s our chance to escape our obligations to others, to reaffirm our connection, to renew our vows.

It was on that cold Valentine’s Day in 2007 that we promised one another to “give you my deepest friendship and love, not only when your moments are high, but when they are low. Not only when you remember clearly your greatness, but also when you forget. Not only when you are acting with love, but when you are not. Not only in times of happiness, but in times of darkness … to honor the life and the divinity within you and to share the life and the divinity within me, through all of our days ahead.”

Our marriage was and is, of course, completely legal. No one said that because my first marriage ended in divorce that I was ineligible. No one said that because my second marriage ended in my wife’s death by cancer that I could not discover love anew.

Instead, it was about love being ever-present in every way because we were open to seeing it. It was about celebrating and enriching the bond that had evolved between us. It was not about rules, but about expansion and self-expression.

And yet I sit here in this beautiful place celebrating this beautiful relationship when I read the ugly news from back home—news that Indiana legislators have, once again, voted to deny to some citizens—those who are gay and lesbian—the blessing of marriage given to Cheri and me.

According to The Indianapolis Star, James Bopp, an attorney for socially conservative causes, said that a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage “has important effects in protecting the … foundation of families and the raising of children … but equally important is the right of the people to make the decision.”

In other words, in a nation that guarantees certain individual rights, some Indiana legislators want to empower a voting majority to deny such rights to a select few.

In a nation founded on the concept that all are created equal, some state lawmakers seek to instill inequality.

In a state that prides itself on “don’t tell me what to do,” some state legislators seek to legislate something as personal as love.

In a state where we preach the importance of jobs and economy, some legislators want to discourage workers and employers from staying or moving here by discriminating against them.

In a state that preaches the gospel of less government, some legislators are preaching government in our bedrooms.

The sad truth is that because he is gay, the celebrant who performed that loving ceremony for us could not, himself, be married in the state of Indiana. Here, love is indeed about rules—with no room for expansion or self-expression.

If we truly care about loving relationships and families, we should vow to end that, not institutionalize it.•

__________

Hetrick is chairman and CEO of Hetrick Communications Inc., an Indianapolis-based public relations and marketing communications firm. His column appears twice a month. He can be reached at bhetrick@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT