Anderson's Paramount Theatre seeks donations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In an effort to finish a project Bill Hardacre dedicated his life to, the Paramount Theatre Centre & Ballroom in Anderson is asking for donations to completely eliminate the debt the 85-year-old building still owes.

Gayle Burris, executive director of the theater, said $800,000 is still owed on the landmark building's mortgage. Officials are hoping to be able to raise that money to honor Hardacre, who died May 11 at the age of 82.

"We think this would be a great way for the community to thank Bill for everything he did for this theater," Burris told The Herald Bulletin. "Twenty-five years ago, this was going to be a parking lot and he stopped that."

When Hardacre learned the building was scheduled for demolition, he got a group of people together to buy the building from the county council and get it back up to code. Burris said the group raised $3.7 million to restore the theater to its former glory.

Hardacre's widow, Ann, said she and Bill grew up going to the Paramount, which was built in 1929.

"I danced there from the time I was about four," Ann said. "And Bill would go watch movies there when he was young."

Ann said her late husband did whatever he could to try and better the community, and saving the Paramount was one of the ways he gave back.

"He wanted to keep it as a meeting place for the community," she said. "Whenever we attended an event he would always say, 'It's a good thing this isn't a parking lot right now.'"

With all the original money that was raised going toward restoring the building, the amount owed to the bank has been much more difficult to pay off. Burris said the Paramount board members are making progress. The $800,000 deficit was $1.5 million five years ago. Still, plenty of help is needed.

"We have been able to knock the debt down thanks to a very tight budget," Burris said. "But we need to get it all gone — or at least a big chunk of it."

She said with as much debt as the Paramount has, it can be tough to book guests to come and perform. She said there are plenty of artists that enjoy playing in old theaters, but the board doesn't have thousands of dollars to pay for the acts.

"I don't think some people understand that you have to pay artists when they come play," Burris said. "And it's hard to pay people when you owe that much to the bank."

With a little more financial leeway, Burris said she hopes the Paramount can begin offering more programs for the community to enjoy. More programs would equal more profit, and Burris hopes that will lead to the Paramount being able to thrive in Anderson for many more years.

New generations of Anderson residents being able to enjoy the Paramount was Hardacre's goal when he decided to save it.

Ann said it would be tremendous if enough money was raised to pay off the remaining debt. She said she was amazed by the memorial contributions made after Hardacre's funeral.

"It would be such a wonderful tribute to him if they could pay the debt off," she said.

Hardacre was passionate about the Paramount right up until his death. Burris said he was at the May board meeting and came to every program the theater had despite his advancing age.

"He really walked the walk," she said. "If there was an event, odds are he would be there. He was always thanking the audience for coming, thanking the performers and anyone else who helped make the program possible."

Burris said one of Hardacre's traits that she appreciated the most was his constant optimism. She said he always tried to look on the bright side even when a situation involving the Paramount looked grim.

She is taking an optimistic view on finally paying off the debt as well. Although $800,000 seems like a lot, Burris believes the money can be raised.

"Nearly everyone who grew up in Anderson has some kind of memory in the Paramount," Burris said. "Whether it's prom or graduation or something. We're hoping people will donate to keep those memories alive."

She sees donations as a tip of the hat to the legacy Hardacre left behind as well.

"We want to show him how much he impacted the community," she said. "This is a way for us to say thank you to Bill."

When people do send donations, Burris said she hopes they also send a note about why they are sending a donation. If she gets enough, she wants to put them in a book as a further testament to Hardacre's legacy.


  • Wonderful place
    Beautiful old theater...amazing "starlight" ceiling and pipe organ...if ever a building needed to be saved, that is one...
    This would be a good use for the food & beverage taxes collected.
  • Maybe the lender could help?
    I'm not sure who the lender is that is holding the $800,000 mortgage on the Paramount Theatre, but if the lender is a local or even regional bank, maybe another avenue is to ask the lender to renegotiate the terms of the theatre's note, or even write off part of the debt as a charitable contribution.
  • Great Facility
    The people of Anderson owe this man big time for saving such an amazing historic facility. I pray the money can be raised to keep the Paramount o good fiscal ground for many years to come. As a country we have to stop demolishing our historic gems, and make sure they live on. So glad this civic hero stepped up and saved not only an Anderson treasure but an Indiana one as well.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.