IBJNews

Angel investors love health care deals

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Health care venture capital has become scarcer in Indiana the past two years, but there are indications that angel investors are picking up some of the slack.

National data issued last week showed that angel investors boosted their median contribution 40 percent last year, to $700,000, from the previous year. And health care investments averaged $1.5 million per deal.

Overall, angel investors poured $873 million into 573 companies last year, with the biggest chunk of those dollars—37 percent—going to health care, according to the HALO Report 2011, released March 8 by Silicon Valley Bank, the Angel Resource Institute and CB Insights.

It was the first report of its kind of the difficult-to-track market. Angel investors are typically wealthy individuals who not only invest their money in startup companies, but often also their time and expertise.

In central Indiana, HALO Capital Group—not associated with the HALO report—has doled out $18 million to 13 startups since it formed in late 2007. Significant chunks of that money have gone to health care companies, such as NICO Corp, PolicyStat LLC, EndGenitor Technologies Inc. and Symbios Medical Products LLC, all based in Indianapolis.

Around the Midwest, health care is the most popular investment, according to the HALO Report 2011. Thirty-one percent of all angel investment deals in the Great Lakes region involved health care companies, with Internet companies a close second at 28 percent.

Nationally, the most popular health care companies by far for angel investors are those making medical devices. Such companies drew 60 percent of all health care investment dollars last year, according to the HALO Report 2011, with all pharma, biotech and drug development firms combined drawing just 22 percent.

Venture capital has increasingly moved away from early-stage companies. According to the 2011 MoneyTree Report, put out by PricewaterhouseCoopers and the National Venture Capital Association, the amount of money invested in seed stage companies by venture capitalists last year dropped 48 percent compared with 2010.

Seed investments by venture capitalists last year totaled $919 million, or $2.3 million per company. The number of deals was nearly identical in each year.

In Indiana, venture capital invested in life sciences and health care companies soared to more than $50 million per year before the recession, and then bottomed in 2010 at just $7.4 million. Investments recovered last year to $27.2 million.

But new deals inked in 2011 drew the smallest amount of money since at least 2005, according to a count by Cleveland-based BioEnterprise, a life sciences development group. Nine Hoosier companies received commitments for just $14.1 million last year.

The MoneyTree report captures payments when they are made, not necessarily when the investment deal was originally struck.

“There’s plenty of capital out there, but it’s looking to invest later if it can, and to drive lower valuations in the company,” David Johnson, CEO of BioCrossroads, an Indianapolis-based life sciences development group, said in a February interview. He added, “The risk curve for much of the market continues to migrate up instead of down.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT