IBJNews

Health care VC hits new Indiana low in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Well, that was a dud.

Last year turned out to be one of the worst in recent Indiana history for health care venture capital investment, according to data compiled by BioEnterprises, a life sciences business development group based in Cleveland.

Nine Hoosier companies landed money last year, the same as in 2010. But the total amount landed was just $14.1 million, the lowest amount of venture capital flowing to Indiana’s health care sector since BioEnterprises began tracking such deals in 2005.

In 2010, Indiana companies attracted $25.1 million and, in 2007—the peak year for the entire region—the state pulled in a whopping $135.6 million.

“Midwest biotechs are suffering from the national venture industry's shift away from early-stage biotech investing,” said Baiju Shah, CEO of BioEnterprise, in a prepared statement. But investors are putting more money into health information technology companies, along with the Midwest’s typical staple: medical-device makers.

“Venture investors are drawn by both providers and payers searching for health IT applications that can improve effectiveness and efficiency of their enterprises," Shah said.

Across all 11 states BioEnterprises tracks, life sciences venture investing rose 10 percent last year, to nearly $810 million. A total of 178 companies raised money, up from 161 the year before.

Indiana wasn’t the only area feeling pain . Michigan and western Pennsylvania both suffered big declines in life sciences venture funding, with Michigan posting its lowest total since 2005 and western Pennsylvania posting its lowest total since 2007.

Minnesota led all states with $223 million in venture investments, flowing mainly to the state’s bevy of medical-device firms. Missouri also saw a big increase last year in venture investing.

Indiana’s totals may be dampened because one of the nine companies receiving money, BioCritica Inc., did not disclose the amount it received. However, the point may be somewhat moot. BioCritica’s business plan—to reinvigorate Eli Lilly and Co.’s sepsis drug Xigris—fell flat when a new clinical trial of the drug caused Lilly to pull it from the market.

BioCritica CEO David Broecker has since joined Indianapolis-based Harlan Laboratories Inc.

The other Indiana companies that received money last year included:

— Indianapolis-based Wellfount Corp., $6 million from Michigan-based Arboretum Ventures

— Fort Wayne-based BioPoly LLC, a subsidiary of Schwartz Biomedical, $2.5 million from undisclosed investors

— Indianapolis-based FAST Diagnostics, $2.25 million from angel investors

— Carmel-based Dormir Inc., $2 million from undisclosed investors

— Brownsburg-based Biologics Modular, $750,000 from undisclosed investors

— Indianapolis-based Symbios Holdings, $300,000 from undisclosed investors

— West Lafayette-based BioSciences Vaccines, $150,000 from Purdue University’s Emerging Innovations Fund

— Indianapolis-based Aarden Pharmaceuticals, $100,000 from the Indiana Seed Fund, overseen by Indianapolis-based BioCrossroads

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is a big help. Thanks for share it here.

  2. Doug Henning!

  3. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  4. Magician and illusionist!

  5. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

ADVERTISEMENT