IBJNews

Health care VC hits new Indiana low in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Well, that was a dud.

Last year turned out to be one of the worst in recent Indiana history for health care venture capital investment, according to data compiled by BioEnterprises, a life sciences business development group based in Cleveland.

Nine Hoosier companies landed money last year, the same as in 2010. But the total amount landed was just $14.1 million, the lowest amount of venture capital flowing to Indiana’s health care sector since BioEnterprises began tracking such deals in 2005.

In 2010, Indiana companies attracted $25.1 million and, in 2007—the peak year for the entire region—the state pulled in a whopping $135.6 million.

“Midwest biotechs are suffering from the national venture industry's shift away from early-stage biotech investing,” said Baiju Shah, CEO of BioEnterprise, in a prepared statement. But investors are putting more money into health information technology companies, along with the Midwest’s typical staple: medical-device makers.

“Venture investors are drawn by both providers and payers searching for health IT applications that can improve effectiveness and efficiency of their enterprises," Shah said.

Across all 11 states BioEnterprises tracks, life sciences venture investing rose 10 percent last year, to nearly $810 million. A total of 178 companies raised money, up from 161 the year before.

Indiana wasn’t the only area feeling pain . Michigan and western Pennsylvania both suffered big declines in life sciences venture funding, with Michigan posting its lowest total since 2005 and western Pennsylvania posting its lowest total since 2007.

Minnesota led all states with $223 million in venture investments, flowing mainly to the state’s bevy of medical-device firms. Missouri also saw a big increase last year in venture investing.

Indiana’s totals may be dampened because one of the nine companies receiving money, BioCritica Inc., did not disclose the amount it received. However, the point may be somewhat moot. BioCritica’s business plan—to reinvigorate Eli Lilly and Co.’s sepsis drug Xigris—fell flat when a new clinical trial of the drug caused Lilly to pull it from the market.

BioCritica CEO David Broecker has since joined Indianapolis-based Harlan Laboratories Inc.

The other Indiana companies that received money last year included:

— Indianapolis-based Wellfount Corp., $6 million from Michigan-based Arboretum Ventures

— Fort Wayne-based BioPoly LLC, a subsidiary of Schwartz Biomedical, $2.5 million from undisclosed investors

— Indianapolis-based FAST Diagnostics, $2.25 million from angel investors

— Carmel-based Dormir Inc., $2 million from undisclosed investors

— Brownsburg-based Biologics Modular, $750,000 from undisclosed investors

— Indianapolis-based Symbios Holdings, $300,000 from undisclosed investors

— West Lafayette-based BioSciences Vaccines, $150,000 from Purdue University’s Emerging Innovations Fund

— Indianapolis-based Aarden Pharmaceuticals, $100,000 from the Indiana Seed Fund, overseen by Indianapolis-based BioCrossroads

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT