IBJNews

City's animal care and control chief resigns after suspensions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The head of Indianapolis Animal Care & Control has resigned after two suspensions, according to IBJ newsgathering partner Fox59.

Dan Shackle, chief of IACC since September 2012, was suspended in mid-March because of an “internal personnel issue,” Fox59 said in its report late Monday. Shackle also had been suspended in January, and two other ACC investigators were let go shortly afterward.

Public Safety Department officials appear concerned about morale at Animal Care and Control. Spencer Moore, a special assistant to the city's director of public safety, will serve as interim chief of ACC, according to the station.

Moore told Fox59 that he hopes to boost morale by sitting down with staffers one on one, going out on runs with animal control officers, and filling at least 10 openings within the department, including IACC's top spot.

“It would be good to see [Moore] spend more time with the employees,” said Valerie Washington, deputy director of the Department of Public Safety. “We do want to make sure we have our pulse on some of the needs and issues, and he will be there every day to field those things for us.”

Moore also served nine years as IACC administrator in the 1990s.

Under Shackle, the city pound’s live-save rate improved from 49 percent in 2011 to 64 percent in 2013. Shackle will leave his position to practice law in Indianapolis, according to Fox59.

Prior to running IACC, he was the nuisance abatement program manager at the Department of Code Enforcement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT