IBJNews

Another General Growth suitor enters fray

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Elliott Associates LP and Paulson & Co. are discussing a plan to team with Brookfield Asset Management Inc. to bring mall owner General Growth Properties Inc. out of bankruptcy, two people familiar with the talks said.

The hedge funds, which have spoken with General Growth, would try to replace or join Fairholme Capital Management LLC and Pershing Square Capital Management LP in a bankruptcy exit plan with Brookfield, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the talks are private. Elliott and Paulson’s alternative proposal may also include Luxor Capital Group LP or other funds, one of the people familiar with their plans said.

“It’s not surprising to see Paulson or Elliott potentially step up to the plate,” said Benjamin Yang, an analyst at Keefe Bruyette & Woods Inc. in San Francisco. “Even with Brookfield- Fairholme-Pershing’s commitment, GGP management has been seeking to raise additional capital at more attractive terms.”

General Growth last month rejected a $10 billion buyout offer by Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc., the biggest U.S. mall owner, that would have given equity holders $9 a share and paid off unsecured creditors in cash. Simon is preparing a new offer, according to a person with knowledge of that plan. The Fairholme-Pershing proposal needs bankruptcy-court approval, giving other investors the chance to make competing bids.

“Anything that happens external to Simon is all noise and someone trying to get involved in the friction of the deal,” said David Fick, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus & Co. in Baltimore. “These assets are more productive in Simon’s hands by a lot.”

Bruce Berkowitz’s Fairholme and William Ackman’s Pershing Square earlier this month offered to jointly invest $3.93 billion in General Growth in addition to $2.63 billion pledged by Toronto-based Brookfield. Under that plan, Fairholme would receive seven-year warrants to buy 60 million shares of existing General Growth stock at an exercise price of $15 each.

A new add-on to the Brookfield plan could be made more attractive if there were fewer warrants issued, said Jim Sullivan, an analyst with Green Street Advisors in Newport Beach, Calif.

“The smaller the warrant grant, the better it is for the other stakeholders—the equity in particular,” he said.

New York-based Elliott has a 5.3-percent stake in General Growth, according to a March 18 regulatory filing. Elliott, founded by Paul Singer, oversees $16.2 billion. Paulson manages $32 billion out of New York.

Armel Leslie, a spokesman for Paulson, declined to comment, as did a spokesman for Elliott. Officials at Luxor Capital didn’t return phone messages. Janice Aman, a spokeswoman for Fairholme, and Denis Couture, a spokesman for Brookfield, also declined to comment, as did Ackman and David Keating, a General Growth spokesman.

General Growth, based in Chicago, filed the largest real estate bankruptcy in U.S. history in April after amassing $27 billion in debt making acquisitions. Its malls include the Grand Canal Shoppes and Fashion Show in Las Vegas, Boston’s Faneuil Hall and South Street Seaport in New York City.

New York-based Pershing Square is General Growth’s biggest equity investor, with a 25-percent economic interest, including 7.5 percent of its shares. Fairholme is the largest creditor, with about $1.83 billion of General Growth’s unsecured debt, Berkowitz and Ackman said in a letter filed March 9 with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission. Pershing Square owns about $434 million of unsecured debt, according to the letter.

Their plan calls for Fairholme and Pershing Square to buy about 380 million new General Growth shares at $10 each.

The investments would combine with 250 million shares Brookfield would buy, $1.5 billion in new debt Brookfield is raising, and a $250 million rights offering for a new company, General Growth Opportunities. Brookfield would backstop $125 million of that sale, meaning it will buy that much if other investors don’t, and Fairholme and Pershing would backstop the rest. Combined, more than $8 billion would be raised.

Brookfield’s plan with Fairholme and Pershing would give General Growth equity holders $15 a share, compared with about $9 a share under Simon’s offer.

General Growth shares have climbed past Brookfield’s offer, indicating investors expect a higher bid. They gained 5 cents Monday to close at $16.80 each.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why should I a home owner pay for this"car sharing" ????

  2. By the way, the right to work law is intended to prevent forced union membership, not as a way to keep workers in bondage as you make it sound, Italiano. If union leadership would spend all of their funding on the workers, who they are supposed to be representing, instead of trying to buy political favor and living lavish lifestyles as a result of the forced membership, this law would never had been necessary.

  3. Unions once served a noble purpose before greed and apathy took over. Now most unions are just as bad or even worse than the ills they sought to correct. I don't believe I have seen a positive comment posted by you. If you don't like the way things are done here, why do you live here? It would seem a more liberal environment like New York or California would suit you better?

  4. just to clear it up... Straight No Chaser is an a capella group that formed at IU. They've toured nationally typically doing a capella arangements of everything from Old Songbook Standards to current hits on the radio.

  5. This surprises you? Mayor Marine pulled the same crap whenhe levered the assets of the water co up by half a billion $$$ then he created his GRAFTER PROGRAM called REBUILDINDY. That program did not do anything for the Ratepayors Water Infrastructure Assets except encumber them and FORCE invitable higher water and sewer rates on Ratepayors to cover debt coverage on the dough he stole FROM THE PUBLIC TRUST. The guy is morally bankrupt to the average taxpayer and Ratepayor.

ADVERTISEMENT