Anthem, insurance trust create Obamacare alternative

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield has teamed up with the Indiana Manufacturers Association to give small manufacturers an option to side-step one of Obamacare’s new restrictions.

The Indianapolis-based health insurer will provide its broadest-network plan to manufacturers with 50 or fewer workers that join a new group insurance trust formed by IMA.

By joining the trust, IMA’s small members could avoid the community rating rules the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, puts into effect Jan. 1. Those rules will raise premiums for employers with younger work forces and reduce premiums for older work forces.

Anthem estimates that, of the nearly 500 IMA members with 50 or fewer workers, two-thirds would see no increase or a decrease in their premiums by joining the trust rather than buying a new policy under the new rules in 2014.

That possibility has sparked “tremendous” interest since IMA launched the trust last month, said Jeff Goodwin, IMA executive vice president.

“We’re going to have the largest network possible, and we’re going to do that in more cost-effective manner,” Goodwin said.

Goodwin expects even more growth a year from now, because many small employers decided to renew their existing insurance policies one month early, which means they don’t have to buy an Obamacare-compliant policy until Dec. 1, 2014.

“I think that 12 months from now, things will look very different,” he said. “I think we’re going to continue to grow.”

A key question is whether more trade associations follow IMA’s example. The Indiana Bankers Association has a similar insurance trust. But in both cases, only companies with federal codes designating them as a manufacturer or a bank can join.

If more associations create insurance trusts, loads of employers could duck Obamacare’s community rating rules. That’s because trusts, by pooling workers from many small firms, act as one large employer. And large employers, because their health plans are regulated by federal, not state, law, are not subject to Obamacare’s community rating rules.

The rules forbid health insurers from charging more than three times as much for the same policy for the oldest people as for the youngest—even between 21- and 64-year olds.

The rules allow insurers to charge 1.5 times more to smokers than to non-smokers, the only health condition insurers that can factor into their premiums.

Obamacare also allows insurers to charge more in areas where the cost of doing business is higher. And, of course, it still allows insurers to charge more for family coverage than for single coverage.

But these rules are far more restrictive than before, especially in Indiana, which had no formal rating structure to limit what insurers could charge older and sicker customers.

The new community rating rules were going to sock First Person Benefit Advisors with an 81-percent premium increase, before the small Indianapolis-based company decided to renew its existing policy early instead.

Goodwin said IMA decided to create the insurance trust to help its members keep offering health benefits and give them easier access to the numerous insurance brokers Anthem uses to sell its employer policies.

He also noted that the association’s insurance trust will offer a compliance dashboard software tool to help small employers adhere to the new ACA reporting requirement, as well as health insurance rules pre-dating the law.

“They usually don’t have an HR department,” Goodwin said of IMA’s small members. “They’re usually relying on an independent broker or us or someone online. We’re helping them stay in compliance with federal and state laws.”


  • Business Lawyer
    Excellent beat! I would like to apprentice while you amend your site, how could I subscribe for a blog website? The account helped me a lot in many ways. More Info: http://auditservices.dreamwidth.org/741.html
  • Charging higher premiums from employees
    So the companies are doing this to be able to charge older workers much higher premiums than younger workers. ... It has been no wonder that if you lost your job after 50 you more than likely were not going to find any employer willing to hire you, and provide insurance.
  • Insurance Principles
    Regarding DW comment. Insurance programs buy reinsurance to prevent against catastrophic loss on an individual basis. It is actually frequency of loss under a retention that causes most programs to go under. It is not one cancer it is 20 cancer claims that cause issues and then, if you adjust rates accordingly, even this is not too big a problem. On a separate comment it is a bit ironic that one association insurer is paying a huge settlement while the other one is tarting with articles about both in the same IBJ. The thing to watch is who is the vendor providing administration. The vendor is responsible for the well being of the program and should be held accountable. I wonder who was handling the teacher's deal referenced above?
  • Read the fine print
    What happens under these plans if an employee contracts cancer or a baby is in the nicu for a month. Associations do experience rate expensive events, the average price in compliant plans may be higher, but the after the fact range will be smaller with expensive events. This is not a new product, it's business as usual.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

    2. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

    3. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

    4. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

    5. No one is complaining about these jobs coming to Indianapolis. We are complaining about the need to subsidize these low wage jobs. Why do you never hear a peep from republicans and tea partiers about this type of welfare? We should only be subsidizing high wage, high skilled jobs.