IBJNews

Court affirms receiver for Michelle Schrenker's assets

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Court of Appeals on Tuesday affirmed a lower court’s decision to appoint a receiver to manage the assets of Michelle Schrenker, the former wife of convicted Fishers money manager Marcus Schrenker.

Marcus Schrenker grabbed headlines last year by crashing his plane and parachuting to safety in an elaborate scheme to fake his death and escape a securities fraud investigation. He was sentenced in August in a Florida court to more than four years in federal prison for crashing the plane and is awaiting trial in Hamilton County on the fraud charges.

Altogether, Schrenker is charged with 11 felony counts of securities fraud. He misappropriated about $1.5 million in investors' money, investigators say.

Hamilton Superior Court Judge J. Richard Campbell appointed a receiver last February at the urging of the Indiana Securities Division, which filed a civil suit against the Schrenkers in an attempt to recover client funds.

The civil suit alleges the Schrenkers violated the Indiana Securities Act by using investor funds for personal use. The securities division lobbied the Hamilton County court to appoint a receiver because of Michelle Schrenker's involvement in the couple’s three investment firms: Heritage Wealth Management, Heritage Insurance Services and Icon Wealth Management.

She agreed to a preliminary injunction preventing her from transferring any assets until an accounting of her finances could be completed, but she objected to a receiver taking control of her property, the appellate court decision said.

As chief financial officer, Michelle Schrenker was paid a monthly salary of $11,600 and “did not consider her position as CFO to be simply a title,” the state asserted.

The appellate court agreed.

“The appointment of a receiver was premised on the trial court’s conclusions Michelle ‘materially aided’ Marcus and his corporations in violating the Securities Act by ‘allowing and personally converting investor funds to be used for the personal use of her and Marcus, and she was ‘jointly and severally liable with and to the same extent as’ Marcus and his companies by virtue of her position as chief financial officer of three companies,” Court of Appeals Judge Melissa May wrote.

Division spokesman Jim Gavin said the appellate court’s decision to keep the receiver in place affirms the confidence the Indiana Secretary of State’s office had in bringing its case against the Schrenkers.

“That was the goal in requesting this receiver, to basically prevent the defendants from transferring any money, anything that pertains to the operation of the businesses,” Gavin said.

Mary F. Schmid, an attorney at Stewart & Irwin PC representing Michelle Schrenker, did not immediately return phone calls seeking comment.

Any decision to file criminal charges against Michelle Schrenker rests with the Hamilton County Prosecutor’s office.




 



 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  2. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

  3. Good try, Mr. Irwin, but I think we all know the primary motivation for pursuing legal action against the BMV is the HUGE FEES you and your firm expect to receive from the same people you claim to be helping ~ taxpayers! Almost all class action lawsuits end up with the victim receiving a pittance and the lawyers receiving a windfall.

  4. Fix the home life. We're not paying for your child to color, learn letters, numbers and possible self control. YOU raise your children...figure it out! We did. Then they'll do fine in elementary school. Weed out the idiots in public schools, send them well behaved kids (no one expects perfection) and watch what happens! Oh, and pray. A mom.

  5. To clarify, the system Cincinnati building is just a streetcar line which is the cheapest option for rail when you consider light rail (Denver, Portland, and Seattle.) The system (streetcar) that Cincy is building is for a downtown, not a city wide thing. With that said, I think the bus plan make sense and something I shouted to the rooftops about. Most cities with low density and low finances will opt for BRT as it makes more financial and logistical sense. If that route grows and finances are in place, then converting the line to a light rail system is easy as you already have the protected lanes in place. I do think however that Indy should build a streetcar system to connect different areas of downtown. This is the same thing that Tucson, Cincy, Kenosha WI, Portland, and Seattle have done. This allows for easy connections to downtown POI, and allows for more dense growth. Connecting the stadiums to the zoo, convention center, future transit center, and the mall would be one streetcar line that makes sense.

ADVERTISEMENT