IBJNews

Court affirms receiver for Michelle Schrenker's assets

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana Court of Appeals on Tuesday affirmed a lower court’s decision to appoint a receiver to manage the assets of Michelle Schrenker, the former wife of convicted Fishers money manager Marcus Schrenker.

Marcus Schrenker grabbed headlines last year by crashing his plane and parachuting to safety in an elaborate scheme to fake his death and escape a securities fraud investigation. He was sentenced in August in a Florida court to more than four years in federal prison for crashing the plane and is awaiting trial in Hamilton County on the fraud charges.

Altogether, Schrenker is charged with 11 felony counts of securities fraud. He misappropriated about $1.5 million in investors' money, investigators say.

Hamilton Superior Court Judge J. Richard Campbell appointed a receiver last February at the urging of the Indiana Securities Division, which filed a civil suit against the Schrenkers in an attempt to recover client funds.

The civil suit alleges the Schrenkers violated the Indiana Securities Act by using investor funds for personal use. The securities division lobbied the Hamilton County court to appoint a receiver because of Michelle Schrenker's involvement in the couple’s three investment firms: Heritage Wealth Management, Heritage Insurance Services and Icon Wealth Management.

She agreed to a preliminary injunction preventing her from transferring any assets until an accounting of her finances could be completed, but she objected to a receiver taking control of her property, the appellate court decision said.

As chief financial officer, Michelle Schrenker was paid a monthly salary of $11,600 and “did not consider her position as CFO to be simply a title,” the state asserted.

The appellate court agreed.

“The appointment of a receiver was premised on the trial court’s conclusions Michelle ‘materially aided’ Marcus and his corporations in violating the Securities Act by ‘allowing and personally converting investor funds to be used for the personal use of her and Marcus, and she was ‘jointly and severally liable with and to the same extent as’ Marcus and his companies by virtue of her position as chief financial officer of three companies,” Court of Appeals Judge Melissa May wrote.

Division spokesman Jim Gavin said the appellate court’s decision to keep the receiver in place affirms the confidence the Indiana Secretary of State’s office had in bringing its case against the Schrenkers.

“That was the goal in requesting this receiver, to basically prevent the defendants from transferring any money, anything that pertains to the operation of the businesses,” Gavin said.

Mary F. Schmid, an attorney at Stewart & Irwin PC representing Michelle Schrenker, did not immediately return phone calls seeking comment.

Any decision to file criminal charges against Michelle Schrenker rests with the Hamilton County Prosecutor’s office.




 



 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT