Are fans ready to forgive Polian?

January 23, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

By the time the next IBJ hits the newsstands we’ll know whether it’s the Colts or The Team the Colts Enabled (the Jets) that will be playing in the Super Bowl. Against that backdrop, I can’t help but reflect on recent IBJ articles (Benner, et al) that touched on the earlier (and now resurrected) Colts-Jets controversy.

Arguably, IBJ is the best publication for reflection on this topic, as the controversy is rooted in business and not sports or “hometown team” loyalty. What I find curious is that not once have I seen a reference to what I feel is the key driver underlying the topic: that the Colts are part of a monopoly operating under government protection (federal anti-trust exemption).

I know about monopolies, as I worked for one (the phone company) in the glory days prior to the government breakup of Ma Bell. It was great fun! The core customer strategy was simple: Take the product we impose on you and pay our high rates—or tell someone who cares and get your phone service from the other (non-existent) phone company.

The Colts find themselves in the same wonderful position with their customers: Take the “no perfect season” product we impose on you and pay our high ticket prices—or tell someone who cares and get your pro football fix from the other (non-existent) pro football team/league.

Bill Polian was unambiguous about his truly arrogant monopolist orientation when he pronounced that having a perfect season was not a priority (translation: a perfect season would not earn Polian or Jim Irsay one red cent, Colts fans be damned!). Surely Polian’s misplaced strategy couldn’t have been driven by his assessment of that strategy maximizing the potential for the Colts organization to profit handsomely from a Super Bowl appearance, could it?

Now we find ourselves with the possibility of Polian’s greed and arrogance coming back to haunt him should The Team the Colts Enabled win. I must admit to being conflicted on the entertainment value flowing from apoplectic fans and media vis-à-vis having the Colts back in the big game.

By late on Jan. 24 we’ll know whether most fans will forgive Polian for good and be back to adoring the Colts or whether we will have been given material to teach our young children: “Don’t cheat, always do your best and never, ever, throw a football game.”

P.S. Despite a sound fundamental product, Ma Bell’s monopoly was broken up. Is it time to eliminate the NFL’s antitrust exemption?


Hal Carter


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.