IBJNews

Indy's housing market posts strong September

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

September was a strong month for the Indianapolis area's housing market, as building permits for new construction and pending sales of existing homes both jumped substantially. 

In the nine-county metropolitan area, the number of home-construction permits filed last month rose to 276, an increase of 22 percent from the same month in 2010, according to the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis.

At the same time, home-sale agreements in the area rose 5.1 percent from September 2010, the fifth straight month of year-over-year increases. Sales agreements climbed to 1,634 last month, an increase of 80 over the same time last year, according to a report released Friday by F.C. Tucker Co.

Year-to-date sales agreements are down 2.7 percent from the same period in 2010.

The same holds true for building activity. Through the first nine months of the year, the number of filings remains 3 percent below last year’s level. A total of 2,862 permits have been filed through September.

In Marion County, 46 single-family building permits were filed last month, but that was still an improvement of 18 percent over September 2010. The county saw a 9.2-percent increase in September sales agreements from a year earlier, from 682 to 745.

The number of Hamilton County sales agreements rose 1.7 percent, from 292 to 297. The number of home-construction permits increased 12 percent, from 90 to 101. Permits also rose 12 percent in Hendricks County, from 41 to 46, while sales agreements increased 14.8 percent, from 142 to 163.

Available homes for sale in the nine-county region dropped 13.6 percent in September, with 14,595 houses on the market. Marion County's inventory fell 14.7 percent.

Year-to-date average sale prices are up 1.8 percent in 2011, from $149,905 to $152,554.

Meanwhile, the increase in September home-construction permits in the metropolitan area marked the third time they’ve risen by double digits within the past four months.

The nine-county area’s September increase matches the 22-percent jump in permit filings for August. The number of permits in July fell 3 percent from the same time in 2010, but they were up 29 percent in June.

The year got off to a rocky start as the first three months of 2010 saw double-digit decreases in permits filed.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Tis the season
    The spike in building permits is not a sign of recovery in the housing market. This is simply the time of the year that builders pull permits to get slabs for specs in the ground before winter sets in. The housing market still needs a boost from Washington before it can ever hope to recover. Congress - are you listening? Real leaders take responsibility - not a vacation!
  • Wrong Guideline
    Increasing the supply of homes in a market filled with vacancies and for sale homes isn't good news.......what do you think put us where we are today?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT