IBJNews

Area home-sale agreements level off, prices still falling

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The housing slump may be weakening in the nine-county Indianapolis area, if a report released today by F.C. Tucker Co. is any indication.

The number of home-sale agreements in August was nearly unchanged from the same time a year ago — off just a tenth of a percent. Pending home sales last month totaled 2,213 compared with 2,216 in August 2008.

“August home sales, virtually the same as last year, reflect the positive and steady rebound of the local real estate market,” H. James Litten, president of F.C. Tucker’s residential real estate services division, said in a written statement.

Johnson County posted the largest increase in sale agreements, 17.8 percent, with 172 in August compared with 146 in the same month last year. Hancock County posted the second-biggest jump, 15.4 percent, with home-sale agreements increased from 65 to 75.

Agreements climbed 5.9 percent in Marion County, from 1,036 to 1,097. Hamilton County is the only other county in the area where pending home sales increased, albeit slightly, from 428 in August 2008 to 432 last month.

Boone, Hendricks, Madison, Morgan and Shelby counties all posted double-digit declines. In three of the counties — Boone, Morgan and Shelby — however, fewer than 100 sale agreements were signed in both August 2008 and last month.

Overall, through August of this year, home-sale agreements in the nine-county area were down 7.5 percent compared to the first eight months of 2008.

The inventory of homes for sale in the nine-county area fell 16.3 percent, to 16,068, last month compared to the same time frame last year, another indicator that the housing slump may be easing.

Yet, the average sale price dropped in every county in the area except Boone, where the price rose a meager 0.4 percent, to $255,609, the most expensive in the nine counties. The average price in the area fell 5.5 percent, to $138,748, in August.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

captcha
Please enter the text you see above:
Not sure? Give me another.

Sponsored by

IBJ on Facebook & Twitter

ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So by that same logic, colleges, NASCAR and a multitude of other organizations must be hiding things because those were also cited by Anthony as events that he cannot get data for. Where are those orgs crowing about their ratings? Again, you pretend that it is only the IRL that Anthony can't get info about.

    Does it sound like Da Nang in '72 around your house? Remember, you are not paranoid if they are really out to get you.

  2. So since the Daytona 500, Super Bowl and MLB have invited potus's to attend, I guess they are in poor condition?

    Security intrustions would be minimal at worst. I was there when the sitting vpotus (Quayle) attended the 500. He was helicoptered in, sat for part of the race in the turn 2 suites and then left with minimal issues. Granted security would be tighter, this would be no worse than him giving a public speech or taking a walk back to the white house like he has done.

    Helicopter him into the infield near the pagoda. whisk him up to the suites in the tower. all is good. The height of the tower and the dark tinting would make it near impossible for a gunman to take aim. other than clearing out the pagoda plaza for a little while, no issues.

  3. take a look at flagstars sign and tell me that is what you want. You can do cool, without destroying the historic fabric of downtown.

  4. Bravo


  5. >

    So you'd perfer an oversized gov't? Without getting into a mud fight about who is right & wrong, it's easy to explain a Liberal mindset: bring all privatized programs under the gov't and make sure it's available to everyone (as if it can't be done without the gov't absorbing it.

    The other thing to go with that is a large gov't is like an umbrella, giving everyone shelter when they need it. But it has to be big enough such that any holes which develop in the umbrella can be protected. If it keeps growing & growing, the greater the chances people should (ought to, but not necessarily will) everyone will be covered.

    There's an excellent example of outsourcing which most people won't think of it: Sallie Mae (nee USA Group). They were ahead of the curve.
    They saw an opportunity for a business and went for it. Obama wants to absorb many companies such as this one into the gov't. Why? Can the federal gov't do it better? I'm not looking at it from the # of jobs lost, I'm looking at how the entire system works.


    >

    One of the stories which was in the press dealt with people near the Illinois border, where people would cross over, drop their kids off at day care, return to Indiana to work. They whined it would screw up their schedules to be out of sync for 6 months. Regardless of the names for time zones, the way I had to express it to clients was, "we're on New York time" or, "We're on Chicago time." Back then they were out of synch six months, weren't they?



ADVERTISEMENT