IBJNews

Area home-sale deals show another monthly increase

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Home-sale agreements in the Indianapolis area rose nearly 12 percent in October compared with the same month last year, marking the sixth straight month of year-over-year increases.

In the nine-county metropolitan area, sales agreements climbed to 1,541 last month, an increase of 163 from the same time last year, according to a report released Thursday by F.C. Tucker Co., the city's largest residential real estate firm.

Year-to-date sales agreements are down 1.2 percent from the same period in 2010.

Jim Litten, president of F.C. Tucker, attributed the improvement in the housing market in part to historically low mortgage rates.

“An increase in sales prices and tightening inventory are both signs of a stabilizing housing market,” he said in a prepared statement.

Year-to-date average sale prices are up 1.4 percent in 2011, from $150,333 to $152,371.

Available homes for sale in the nine-county region dropped 12.5 percent in October, with 13,972 homes on the market, 2,019 fewer than in October 2010.

Marion County saw a 13.3-percent increase in October sales agreements from a year earlier, from 617 to 699.

The number of sales agreements in the residential hotbed of Hamilton County, though, dropped 8.1 percent, from 297 to 273.

Hendricks County saw a 33.6-percent increase in sale agreements, from 107 to 143.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Spoofing about real estate recovery
    Someone has to have it wrong: Recently, Yahoo claimed that Indianapolis was one of the worst real estate markets. Now, this article suggests that a recovery is underway. Someone has to be incorrect.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT