IBJNews

Area home-sales slump continues in December

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Home-sale agreements in the nine-county central Indiana region fell 15.4 percent in December compared to the same month of 2009, according to a report released Wednesday by F.C. Tucker Co.

For the entire year, pending home sales dropped 10.9 percent from 2009, Tucker said.

Sales agreements fell  to 1,147 last month, down from 1,355 in December 2009. The decline marked the eighth straight month that year-over-year home sales have slumped in central Indiana. The area experienced three straight months of improving sales activity early in the year thanks to generous federal tax incentives.

Overall, pending sales in 2010 sank to 21,594, down from 24,223 in 2009.

Pending home sales account for sales agreements, not sales that have closed.

In Marion County, December sales agreements fell 20 percent compared with the previous year, from 649 to 519. For all of 2010, sales agreements in Marion County dropped 13.9 percent from 2009.

Pending sales dropped 16.3 percent in December in Hamilton County, from 246 to 206, and 8.7 percent in Hendricks County, from 103 to 94.

For 2010, the average sale price of a home sold in central Indiana was $150,161, up 8.2 percent from 2009, the report said.

Active listings dipped 0.2 percent last month, from 14,105 to 14,074.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT