IBJNews

Area residential building permits up in October

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

New-home construction in the Indianapolis area increased for the third consecutive month in October and could surpass last year’s activity if it finishes 2011 with two more solid months.

In the nine-county metropolitan area, the number of home-construction permits filed last month rose to 269, an increase of 16 percent from the same month in 2010, according to the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis.

The number of filings through October is still 2 percent below last year’s level, but that translates to a difference of just 62 permits, which could be surpassed if increases maintain the levels of the past three months.

A total of 3,134 permits have been filed through October, compared with 3,196 during the first 10 months of 2010.

In Marion County, 44 single-family building permits were filed last month, an improvement of 29 percent over October 2010.

Hamilton County showed the biggest gain. The number of permits filed there last month jumped 56 percent, to 103. Permits rose 41 percent in Johnson County but fell by the same percentage in Hendricks County.

The nine-county area saw a 23-percent jump in permit filings in September and a 22-percent rise in August.

The year got off to a rocky start as the first three months of 2011 saw double-digit decreases in permits filed. Generous federal tax credits in early 2010 to help spur homebuying led to the dip this year.

BAGI CEO Steve Lains said he is encouraged by the uptick the past three months.

"For 2011 to end up the same or possibly even better than 2010, that shows some strength in the marketplace," he said. "That's a strong indicator that the market has stabilized and is starting to move in the right direction."

Despite the increase over 2010, building permits in October were still 26 percent below 2009's number and less than half the 626 permits filed in October 2007 prior to the latest recession.

Nationally, through September, single-family building permits are off 10 percent from the same time in 2010.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT