IBJNews

WellPoint records subpoened in California probe

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc., Aetna Inc. and Cigna Corp. are among health-care companies whose financial records have been subpoenaed by the state of California in a probe into rising premiums and denied medical claims.

The rate-setting and claims practices may be illegal, California Attorney General Jerry Brown said in an e-mailed statement, adding that the companies have 30 days to turn over financial and other records covered by the subpoenas. Documents were also demanded from Health Net Inc., Blue Shield of California, Kaiser Permanente and PacifiCare Health Systems Inc.

|The investigation was undertaken in response to reports that California insurance providers deny almost 40 percent of claims, Brown said. The subpoenas cover health plans that reimburse doctors and hospitals for services, and follow a demand Brown made last month for documents covering the same companies’ managed-care plans, or health maintenance organizations, he said.

U.S. Representative Henry Waxman, D-Calif., yesterday claimed that Indianapolis-based WellPoint, the biggest U.S. health insurer by enrollment, sought to raise health-insurance rates in California to boost profits and cover costs ballooned by executive pay and corporate retreats. At a hearing in Washington, Waxman said the company also may have manipulated calculations to justify the proposed 39 percent rate increase for Californians who buy their own policies.

WellPoint paid compensation of at least $1 million apiece to 39 executives in 2008 and spent $27 million over two years on executive getaways, Waxman said, citing documents obtained by his committee.

Kristin Binns, a WellPoint spokeswoman, said in an e-mail that she was trying to verify the company received the subpoenas. If so, WellPoint will review Brown’s request and “respond appropriately,” she said.

WellPoint Chief Executive Officer Angela Braly said at the hearing Wednesday that the company’s proposed rate increase for Californians who buy their own policies was driven by surging costs and a recession that forced healthy people to drop coverage.

Aetna, based in Hartford, Conn., is the third-largest U.S. medical insurer. Cigna, whose shares rose the most among the largest insurers last year, is based in Philadelphia.

Chris Curran, a Cigna spokesman, said the company hasn’t yet received the subpoena and when it does, “we’ll respond to his office as appropriate.”

Aetna Inc. spokesman Fred Laberge didn’t immediately return calls seeking comment after regular business hours.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT