IBJNews

WellPoint records subpoened in California probe

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc., Aetna Inc. and Cigna Corp. are among health-care companies whose financial records have been subpoenaed by the state of California in a probe into rising premiums and denied medical claims.

The rate-setting and claims practices may be illegal, California Attorney General Jerry Brown said in an e-mailed statement, adding that the companies have 30 days to turn over financial and other records covered by the subpoenas. Documents were also demanded from Health Net Inc., Blue Shield of California, Kaiser Permanente and PacifiCare Health Systems Inc.

|The investigation was undertaken in response to reports that California insurance providers deny almost 40 percent of claims, Brown said. The subpoenas cover health plans that reimburse doctors and hospitals for services, and follow a demand Brown made last month for documents covering the same companies’ managed-care plans, or health maintenance organizations, he said.

U.S. Representative Henry Waxman, D-Calif., yesterday claimed that Indianapolis-based WellPoint, the biggest U.S. health insurer by enrollment, sought to raise health-insurance rates in California to boost profits and cover costs ballooned by executive pay and corporate retreats. At a hearing in Washington, Waxman said the company also may have manipulated calculations to justify the proposed 39 percent rate increase for Californians who buy their own policies.

WellPoint paid compensation of at least $1 million apiece to 39 executives in 2008 and spent $27 million over two years on executive getaways, Waxman said, citing documents obtained by his committee.

Kristin Binns, a WellPoint spokeswoman, said in an e-mail that she was trying to verify the company received the subpoenas. If so, WellPoint will review Brown’s request and “respond appropriately,” she said.

WellPoint Chief Executive Officer Angela Braly said at the hearing Wednesday that the company’s proposed rate increase for Californians who buy their own policies was driven by surging costs and a recession that forced healthy people to drop coverage.

Aetna, based in Hartford, Conn., is the third-largest U.S. medical insurer. Cigna, whose shares rose the most among the largest insurers last year, is based in Philadelphia.

Chris Curran, a Cigna spokesman, said the company hasn’t yet received the subpoena and when it does, “we’ll respond to his office as appropriate.”

Aetna Inc. spokesman Fred Laberge didn’t immediately return calls seeking comment after regular business hours.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT