IBJNews

Brightpoint prices offering of 15 million shares

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Wireless device distributor Brightpoint Inc. said today it has priced 15 million shares of a previously announced stock offering at $5 each.

The pricing follows the Indianapolis-based company’s announcement Monday that shareholder NC Telecom Holding A/S would sell 15 million common shares in a public offering.

NC Telecom is the entity that owned Denmark-based Dangaard Telecom before Brightpoint bought it in August 2007 for $385 million in stock and the assumption of $350 million in Dangaard debt.

But the deal has lost much of its luster, as Dangaard has not performed to expectations.

Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. is the sole underwriter for the offering and has a 30-day period in which to exercise an option to purchase an additional 1.5 million shares from NC Telecom.

In a separate Securities and Exchange filing, Brightpoint predicted Monday a second quarter profit in line with analysts’ estimates. Its revenue outlook fell below expectations, however.

For the quarter ended June 30, the company anticipates adjusted income from continuing operations of 7 cents to 13 cents per share.

Analysts on average expect the company to earn 7 cents a share on revenue of $780.5 million. Brightpoint predicts revenue will drop about 40 percent, to $722 million to $727 million.

Brightpoint expects to report complete quarterly financial results Aug. 6.

To celebrate the company’s 20th anniversary, Brightpoint CEO Robert Laikin rang the bell this morning to open trading on the NASDAQ stock exchange.

Company shares opened this morning at $5.49 cents, down from a 52-week high of $8.90 in August.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT