IBJNews

Star union voting on new contract

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indianapolis Newspaper Guild plans to vote this afternoon on a new, two-year contract with the Gannett Co.-owned Indianapolis Star that includes a 10-percent pay cut and two-year wage freeze.

If ratified, the agreement covering 185 employees represented by the union would take effect Aug. 30. Guild President Tom Spalding declined this morning to predict the vote’s outcome, but he said the proposal is better than previous offers.

“We feel this is the best deal we could get from Gannett,” he said. “It’s the one that has the least amount of damage.”

With the assistance of a federal mediator, the guild’s leadership reached an agreement with representatives of Virginia-based Gannett and the Star on Aug. 7 to take the proposal to membership for a vote.

Gannett had sought a 12-percent pay cut—an offer that union members overwhelmingly rejected in late June.

Approval of today’s contract proposal also would settle a dispute involving seven of 18 union members who were let go in December. The guild contends the company disregarded seniority rights and is seeking their reinstatement, with back pay.

An arbitration hearing is set for Sept. 23. But ratification of the contract would settle the arbitration claim and prevent the employees from returning, Spalding said.

The Star laid off 37 more employees in July as the state’s largest daily newspaper continued to struggle with a weakened economy and falling advertising revenue.

Seventeen of those let go were in the newsroom, including seven editors, which constituted one-fourth of the editorial management team.

The most recent layoffs at the Star were part of massive reductions across all Gannett properties, including 85 daily newspapers, most notably USA Today. The company shed 1,400 jobs, or about 3 percent of its total work force.

Union leaders are hopeful that agreeing to a pay cut will stave off additional job cuts.

“If the vote is favorable, we feel that having a contract, even a weakened contract, is better than the alternative of paying severance when [there are] layoffs,” Spalding said.

Voting on the Star contract began today at noon and lasts until 6 p.m.

Star management did not return phone calls seeking comment.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT