IBJNews

Star union voting on new contract

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Newspaper Guild plans to vote this afternoon on a new, two-year contract with the Gannett Co.-owned Indianapolis Star that includes a 10-percent pay cut and two-year wage freeze.

If ratified, the agreement covering 185 employees represented by the union would take effect Aug. 30. Guild President Tom Spalding declined this morning to predict the vote’s outcome, but he said the proposal is better than previous offers.

“We feel this is the best deal we could get from Gannett,” he said. “It’s the one that has the least amount of damage.”

With the assistance of a federal mediator, the guild’s leadership reached an agreement with representatives of Virginia-based Gannett and the Star on Aug. 7 to take the proposal to membership for a vote.

Gannett had sought a 12-percent pay cut—an offer that union members overwhelmingly rejected in late June.

Approval of today’s contract proposal also would settle a dispute involving seven of 18 union members who were let go in December. The guild contends the company disregarded seniority rights and is seeking their reinstatement, with back pay.

An arbitration hearing is set for Sept. 23. But ratification of the contract would settle the arbitration claim and prevent the employees from returning, Spalding said.

The Star laid off 37 more employees in July as the state’s largest daily newspaper continued to struggle with a weakened economy and falling advertising revenue.

Seventeen of those let go were in the newsroom, including seven editors, which constituted one-fourth of the editorial management team.

The most recent layoffs at the Star were part of massive reductions across all Gannett properties, including 85 daily newspapers, most notably USA Today. The company shed 1,400 jobs, or about 3 percent of its total work force.

Union leaders are hopeful that agreeing to a pay cut will stave off additional job cuts.

“If the vote is favorable, we feel that having a contract, even a weakened contract, is better than the alternative of paying severance when [there are] layoffs,” Spalding said.

Voting on the Star contract began today at noon and lasts until 6 p.m.

Star management did not return phone calls seeking comment.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT