EPA proposes $1.1M settlement with Vertellus

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Chemical-maker Vertellus Specialties Inc. will spend up to $1.1 million and change air-emission monitoring practices at its plant on the southwest side of Indianapolis under a proposed settlement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The proposal, filed last week in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis, is the culmination of years of negotiations between the company and the EPA over alleged Clean Air Act violations.

The settlement proposal calls for a 30-day period in which the court will allow public comment. The comment period began Friday, Aug. 21.

After a surprise inspection in 2005, the EPA made 17 different claims about Vertellus’ violations, including improper monitoring procedures, faulty record-keeping and excessive toxic-air emissions. Many of the problems EPA cited, including a large source of what EPA calls “hazardous air pollutants,” have already been remedied.

“We immediately began discussing with them the concerns they raised before they even left the facility,” said John Jones, director of regulatory management at Vertellus, formerly known as Reilly Industries.

Vertellus admits no wrongdoing and will pay $425,000 to the government. In addition, the company, which is owned by the Chicago-based private equity firm Wind Point Partners, will spend $705,000 on equipment upgrades. The upgrades are over and above what environmental regulations require.

Bill Beranek, president of the Indiana Environmental Institute, said the size of the Vertellus settlement indicates the procedural nature of the company’s violations.

“I don’t think [EPA is] alleging there was an enormous degree of harm from this particular plant for this particular thing,” he said.

Beranek, who facilitates meetings between Wayne Township neighbors and the company, said Vertellus has made great strides in reducing the plant’s noxious odors and toxic vapors over the years.

Vertellus has multiple factories around the globe and 750 employees. About 300 people work for the company in Indianapolis.

Vertellus uses various volatile and toxic ingredients, including acetaldehyde and benzene, in making chemicals for sale to agricultural chemical companies. Its customers include Dow AgroSciences LLC and Syngenta AG.

Most of the issues that EPA cited related to the monitoring of dozens of valves, pumps and connectors at the plant. While the EPA did not necessarily find vapor leaks, Vertellus’ methods to detect them weren’t adequate, the agency said.

EPA found that one Vertellus plant, which uses cyanide and benzene as main ingredients, was emitting more than 25 tons of “hazardous air pollutants” per year. In 2007, the company capped the offending vent with an incinerator.

Jones said the new incinerator removes 99.8 percent of toxins, exceeding the EPA requirement of 98 percent.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

  2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

  3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

  4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

  5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).