IBJNews

EPA proposes $1.1M settlement with Vertellus

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Chemical-maker Vertellus Specialties Inc. will spend up to $1.1 million and change air-emission monitoring practices at its plant on the southwest side of Indianapolis under a proposed settlement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The proposal, filed last week in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis, is the culmination of years of negotiations between the company and the EPA over alleged Clean Air Act violations.

The settlement proposal calls for a 30-day period in which the court will allow public comment. The comment period began Friday, Aug. 21.

After a surprise inspection in 2005, the EPA made 17 different claims about Vertellus’ violations, including improper monitoring procedures, faulty record-keeping and excessive toxic-air emissions. Many of the problems EPA cited, including a large source of what EPA calls “hazardous air pollutants,” have already been remedied.

“We immediately began discussing with them the concerns they raised before they even left the facility,” said John Jones, director of regulatory management at Vertellus, formerly known as Reilly Industries.

Vertellus admits no wrongdoing and will pay $425,000 to the government. In addition, the company, which is owned by the Chicago-based private equity firm Wind Point Partners, will spend $705,000 on equipment upgrades. The upgrades are over and above what environmental regulations require.

Bill Beranek, president of the Indiana Environmental Institute, said the size of the Vertellus settlement indicates the procedural nature of the company’s violations.

“I don’t think [EPA is] alleging there was an enormous degree of harm from this particular plant for this particular thing,” he said.

Beranek, who facilitates meetings between Wayne Township neighbors and the company, said Vertellus has made great strides in reducing the plant’s noxious odors and toxic vapors over the years.

Vertellus has multiple factories around the globe and 750 employees. About 300 people work for the company in Indianapolis.

Vertellus uses various volatile and toxic ingredients, including acetaldehyde and benzene, in making chemicals for sale to agricultural chemical companies. Its customers include Dow AgroSciences LLC and Syngenta AG.

Most of the issues that EPA cited related to the monitoring of dozens of valves, pumps and connectors at the plant. While the EPA did not necessarily find vapor leaks, Vertellus’ methods to detect them weren’t adequate, the agency said.

EPA found that one Vertellus plant, which uses cyanide and benzene as main ingredients, was emitting more than 25 tons of “hazardous air pollutants” per year. In 2007, the company capped the offending vent with an incinerator.

Jones said the new incinerator removes 99.8 percent of toxins, exceeding the EPA requirement of 98 percent.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT