IBJNews

Three-quarters of state high schools miss standards

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Three-quarters of Indiana's public high schools failed to meet state standards for academic improvement during the 2009-2010 school year, a figure the state's top education official said Tuesday shows schools are failing students once they reach high school.

The state Department of Education said 75 percent of Indiana's 385 public high schools are ranked in the bottom two rungs of the state's five-tier ranking system. Nearly half are on the lowest level — academic probation — and 20 schools in their fifth year of probation could face intervention or even state takeover.

"I think it is a huge number. And I think it is very concerning," state schools Superintendent Tony Bennett said.

The percentage of high schools on probation was up from 10 percent in 2008, the last year for which data were available due to a switch to spring standardized testing. Overall, the number of all schools on probation was 14 percent, the department said.

About 19 percent of Indiana's public schools fell into a lower category this year than in 2008. And about 42 percent moved into higher categories, while the rest stayed in the same tier.

While elementary and middle schools have shown improvement under the state's 11-year-old accountability system, high schools continue to decline, Bennett said. "We really begin to see serious declines in student performance at the high schools," he said.

Bennett said schools must figure out what they need to do to meet the needs of students once they reach high school and prepare them for college or work.

"We have to raise our level of expectations, we have to raise the rigor of instruction and we have to increase the relevance of instruction," Bennett said. "We are losing far too many students in these schools."

Jonathan Plucker, director of Indiana University's Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, said some of the dip in high school performance may have been due to changes in standardized testing procedures, including the switch to spring testing and basing high school results on algebra and English instead of a graduation exam. But, the decline from elementary to middle to high school was a national phenomenon. Federal data released last week showed a similar trend, he said.

"Improvement in high school is just proving to be so much harder," Plucker said. "Student performance tends to suffer as we go through the system."

No one knows whether the real cause is socioeconomic, cultural, lack of parental support or something else, he said.

Plucker said the country may need to rethink its whole approach to high school education.

"It's not getting better. It appears to be getting worse. We need to do something here," he said.

Bennett said he was prepared to make "strong recommendations" about intervening at high schools on probation if they don't improve by the end of the school year.

"The clock is ticking," Bennett said.

Meanwhile, the number of schools meeting federal progress standards under the No Child Left Behind law increased to 58 percent from 50 percent in 2008, with particularly strong gains among poor and minority students, according to results released by the state agency Tuesday. Bennett attributed part of those gains to the increased use of statistical and scoring data to drive instruction at elementary and middle schools.

The state rankings are separate from federal accountability measures required under the No Child Left Behind law, though both were released the same day. The federal progress goals only account for performance on statewide exams, while the state rankings give credit to schools for both performance and improvement over time. Consequences of the federal law only apply to schools receiving certain federal funding, while the state consequences apply to all public schools except charter schools.

State education officials are working on revamping Indiana's accountability system and hope to seek a federal waiver next year to replace the current dual improvement system with a single state system, Bennett said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Man Up
    It's time for Dupree and his/her ilk to 1) learn how to spell -- I hope he/she is not a teacher!, and 2) stop being defensive and offer up solutions of their own.

    Surely they cannot believe that our schools are performing admirably. If they agree that improvements are needed, be a part of the solution by engaging in constructive action and stop the defensive whining that does no good for even one student.
  • It is time for Bennett to try just one failing school...he can't do better.
    It is easy for Mr. Bennett to say "failing school", yet we need to point out that Mr. Bennett had failing schools when he was school superintendent. I would guess that today, by his standards, he would be a failing gym teacher, not being able to get all the students to run a fast mile.

    Bennett needs to stop talking and actually show a real plan that would turn an IPS school into success with the funds available.

    Talk is cheep. Time for Bennett to do something constructive.

    Dupree

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT