Three-quarters of Indiana's public high schools failed to meet state standards for academic improvement during the 2009-2010
school year, a figure the state's top education official said Tuesday shows schools are failing students once they reach
high school.
The state Department of Education said 75 percent of Indiana's 385 public high schools are ranked in the bottom two rungs
of the state's five-tier ranking system. Nearly half are on the lowest level — academic probation — and 20
schools in their fifth year of probation could face intervention or even state takeover.
"I think it is a huge number. And I think it is very concerning," state schools Superintendent Tony Bennett said.
The percentage of high schools on probation was up from 10 percent in 2008, the last year for which data were available due
to a switch to spring standardized testing. Overall, the number of all schools on probation was 14 percent, the department
said.
About 19 percent of Indiana's public schools fell into a lower category this year than in 2008. And about 42 percent
moved into higher categories, while the rest stayed in the same tier.
While elementary and middle schools have shown improvement under the state's 11-year-old accountability system, high
schools continue to decline, Bennett said. "We really begin to see serious declines in student performance at the high
schools," he said.
Bennett said schools must figure out what they need to do to meet the needs of students once they reach high school and prepare
them for college or work.
"We have to raise our level of expectations, we have to raise the rigor of instruction and we have to increase the relevance
of instruction," Bennett said. "We are losing far too many students in these schools."
Jonathan Plucker, director of Indiana University's Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, said some of the dip in
high school performance may have been due to changes in standardized testing procedures, including the switch to spring testing
and basing high school results on algebra and English instead of a graduation exam. But, the decline from elementary to middle
to high school was a national phenomenon. Federal data released last week showed a similar trend, he said.
"Improvement in high school is just proving to be so much harder," Plucker said. "Student performance tends
to suffer as we go through the system."
No one knows whether the real cause is socioeconomic, cultural, lack of parental support or something else, he said.
Plucker said the country may need to rethink its whole approach to high school education.
"It's not getting better. It appears to be getting worse. We need to do something here," he said.
Bennett said he was prepared to make "strong recommendations" about intervening at high schools on probation if
they don't improve by the end of the school year.
"The clock is ticking," Bennett said.
Meanwhile, the number of schools meeting federal progress standards under the No Child Left Behind law increased to 58 percent
from 50 percent in 2008, with particularly strong gains among poor and minority students, according to results released by
the state agency Tuesday. Bennett attributed part of those gains to the increased use of statistical and scoring data to drive
instruction at elementary and middle schools.
The state rankings are separate from federal accountability measures required under the No Child Left Behind law, though
both were released the same day. The federal progress goals only account for performance on statewide exams, while the state
rankings give credit to schools for both performance and improvement over time. Consequences of the federal law only apply
to schools receiving certain federal funding, while the state consequences apply to all public schools except charter schools.
State education officials are working on revamping Indiana's accountability system and hope to seek a federal waiver
next year to replace the current dual improvement system with a single state system, Bennett said.

















IBJ Conversations
2 Comments
Add Comment
Surely they cannot believe that our schools are performing admirably. If they agree that improvements are needed, be a part of the solution by engaging in constructive action and stop the defensive whining that does no good for even one student.
Bennett needs to stop talking and actually show a real plan that would turn an IPS school into success with the funds available.
Talk is cheep. Time for Bennett to do something constructive.
Dupree