IBJNews

State sentencing overhaul to take another year

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Legislators stung last year by county prosecutors who opposed a sweeping plan to overhaul Indiana's criminal sentencing scheme won't push the issue in this year's General Assembly.

Backers said last year's bill, endorsed by Gov. Mitch Daniels, would have saved $1.2 billion in new prison construction over seven years by easing penalties for low-level offenders like petty thieves and drug dealers who crowd state lockups. But the bill stalled after prosecutors said it was too soft on crime.

This year, with prosecutors' concerns largely eased, sheriffs are worried that an attempt to reduce crowding in state prisons could aggravate overpopulation in their jails.

"Overcrowding is a daily concern for the sheriff and ... adding more inmates on top of already overcrowded jail facilities would make a recipe for future lawsuits," said Steve Luce, executive director of the Indiana Sheriffs Association.

Officials hope to send many of those low-level felons to community corrections programs such as work release, but Luce said they still could end up in jail if they violate the terms of their sentence.

Luce said low-level offenders—those convicted of class D felonies—currently account for about 15 percent of Indiana's prison population. Shipping those to county jails would add about 45 inmates to each lockup on average, he said, though in practice larger counties would likely receive more prisoners than smaller counties.

"I think the sheriffs have a legitimate concern," said Republican Rep. Ralph Foley of Martinsville, who serves on the Criminal Code Evaluation Commission, one of two state panels involved in the sentencing overhaul.

Ohio-Dearborn County Prosecutor Aaron Negangard, who serves on the board of the Indiana Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, said prosecutors' concerns about the legislation that came out of a study by the Pew Center on the States and the Council of State Governments Justice Center had been largely eased, but prosecutors were reserving judgment until they saw the final product.

He said prosecutors' main concern was that violent criminals receive strict penalties and serve more time in prison. Last year's prison legislation was amended to have offenders serve a higher proportion of their sentences, but the bill bogged down amid debate.

"When someone can get the maximum on a rape and be out in six years, that's a problem," Negangard said.

A key legislator said overhauling state sentences is such a huge undertaking that any proposal was bound to include sections that would offend various interests.

"If people are against it, they'll just divide and conquer. There's going to be things in here they like and things they don't like," said Republican Brent Steele of Bedford, who chaired the criminal law and sentencing policy study committee.

The two panels charged with sentencing overhaul did come up with a few pieces of proposed legislation—chiefly routing more support to local community corrections programs—but decided to put off the main push of reorganizing penalties, in part because the job is so big.

"It's not going to happen in 2012," Steele said, adding the panels would keep working throughout the summer and hoped to have a package of legislation ready for 2013.

He said it took lawmakers two years to overhaul the criminal code in the 1970s, the last time they attempted it.

"It's important to the prosecutors that it be a comprehensive and complete process, from top to bottom," Negangard said.

Currently, Indiana has four levels of felonies—D, C, B and A—with escalating penalties. Officials say a group has been working on converting the four-tier system into a six-level one, which would allow more flexibility in sentencing. Officials have not determined penalties for each level.

"It's not a one-size shoe fits all. There was no latitude ... there was no room to wiggle," Steele said.

The challenge facing lawmakers is to make penalties better fit the crime and ease penalties on low-level offenders without relaxing them for violent criminals. And to do that, it has to get a bill passed.

"We have a big mission. Can we make a difference? Yes. Do we have the political will to make a difference? I hope so," Foley said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Now if he'd just stay there...

  2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

  3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

  4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

  5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.

ADVERTISEMENT