Audio recording history on display in dealer's HQ

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A photograph of American innovator Thomas Edison and Hoosier businessman O.K. Van Ausdall hangs just inside the doors of a private room at office equipment dealer Van Ausdall & Farrar headquarters on Indianapolis’ northeast side.

The men are looking at an early version of one of Edison’s many inventions: the Ediphone, an automated dictating machine that would revolutionize corporate communications. They were gathered for the 50th anniversary of the device, appropriately titled the Ediphone Jubilee of 1927.

Edison Eric von Grimmenstein, CEO of Van Ausdall & Farrar, gives a tour of the Voice Museum. “This is the root of our business,” he said. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Founded in 1914, the firm got its start when Edison selected Van Ausdall as an Ediphone distributor. Since then, the company has been proud of its association with the American icon, and now Van Ausdall & Farrar has its own in-house Voice Museum to pay homage to its history.

“This is the root of our business,” said President Eric von Grimmenstein. “The partnership Edison and Mr. Van Ausdall formed is part of the reason we are the largest independently owned office technology company in Indiana today.”

Von Grimmenstein, 55, has been fascinated with the history of audio recording for more than 20 years. He started out collecting antique radios and jukeboxes, but in the last six years has focused on finding and restoring recorded-voice artifacts—now housed at the company’s private museum.

He established the museum three years ago to provide a link between the history of audio recording technology and the company, which he owns.

Dozens of variations of Edison’s invention are arranged in chronological order along the walls, showing how the Ediphone evolved over time—from early, stand-alone machines housed in wooden cabinets with megaphone-like mouthpieces to the smaller, more streamlined examples. More modern, desktop versions of the device are on display behind glass in the center of the room, along with some of the smaller-scale artifacts such as wax cylinders.

Von Grimmenstein sees value in incorporating the museum into the business, which employs about 200 and pulled in $30 million in revenue in 2009.

“We’re a local company with a lot of history, and to a lot of people, that makes a difference,” he said.

The museum, housed in a well-lit room next to the lobby, primarily is used to educate clients and the occasional special guest about the history of audio technology—still a key component of the office automation industry.

Such private collections are not unusual at businesses of all kinds, said Elee Wood, assistant professor of museum studies at IUPUI.

“Certainly, a lot of corporations want to explore their own histories,” she said. “Chronicling the progress of their company is tied to their identity.”
Timeline of the development of audio recording technology
The idea for the audio museum came after von Grimmenstein visited an Edison museum in Florida that celebrated the phonograph. Although the early record player was one of his most significant inventions—Edison was posthumously awarded a Grammy in 1977 for his achievement in recorded sound—he was much more interested in its business applications.

“Edison envisioned it as a business tool because he believed the biggest need for it was in the office,” said Don Gfell, a trustee of the Edison Home in Milan, Ohio.

Edison thought the device would revolutionize the workplace, and it was marketed as such. Above one of the dictating machines at the museum is a large advertisement from France claiming that notetaking by hand was ancient history, and business phonographs were the wave of the future. However, the machines were slow to catch on. It wasn’t until 1975, when the handheld audio recorder was introduced, that voice recording became common.

“People forget that from the early 1900s to about the 1960s, these machines were the only means of audio recording,” Gfell said.

Recently, Gfell and members of the Michigan Antique Phonograph Collectors buried an Ediphone cylinder as part of a time capsule along with more contemporary devices. Their hypothesis was that whoever finds the capsule in the future will be able to play only the more primitive cylinder because the other forms of technology will be incompatible.

Fact boz on Van Ausdall and FarrarGfell, who has amassed Edison artifacts for more than 40 years, said the Internet has made collecting easier. Putting together museum-quality pieces in as little time as it took von Grimmenstein would have been nearly impossible just two decades ago. Instead, a collector would have to depend on word of mouth and put in some road miles. Gfell traveled across the country searching antique shops, flea markets and auctions to find one-of-a-kind artifacts.

“The hunt, as some of us collectors say, was a major thrill. You really had to be knowledgeable about the history surrounding the antique you were looking for,” Gfell said.

Technology also has improved on Edison’s idea of recorded voice. While cell phones and the Internet have had an impact on corporate communications, von Grimmenstein said many of his clients couldn’t do their jobs effectively without audio recorders.

“We do a lot of business for those in the health care industry. For example, surgeons use audio recording devices to take notes during surgery by stepping on a button on the floor,” he said. “The surgeon can then take the audio file and have it converted into text, making the process of writing medical reports far more efficient.”

Voice recording technology accounts for a third of Van Ausdall & Farrar’s business, von Grimmenstein said—further proof of the endurance of Edison’s ideas.•


Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.