IBJOpinion

Bait and switch at Biglari Holdings?

May 15, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

In light of Biglari Holdings’ recent decision to implement a new incentive bonus agreement for its CEO and chairman, Sardar Biglari, I am concerned.

The current system, as proposed, runs contrary to the ethos Mr. Biglari claimed to have when nominating himself for election to the board of Steak n Shake (now known as Biglari Holdings).

It wasn’t long ago that Mr. Biglari sang a different tune on compensation. When trying to win the hearts of Steak n Shake shareholders and gain a seat on the company’s board he voiced a strong opinion on how executives should be compensated:

“In our assessment, the variable element of the compensation package should be tied to the executives’ ability to generate free cash flow and to earn a high return on invested capital.”

Biglari continued: “The current compensation arrangement is askew, so that even if the company performs below its competitors, management and directors will stand to gain.”

The proposed compensation arrangement, applied retroactively to prior Steak n Shake management, would increase the very rewards Mr. Biglari claimed, at the time, were excessive in light of management’s poor performance and value destruction.

I suspect Mr. Biglari’s thinking towards compensation has changed now that he’s in charge. How else could he desire a pay package that violates his own, purported, tenets? The package as proposed could easily reward him handsomely in the event the company performs below its competitors. And the proposal uses the notion of equity rather than invested capital.

I believe the current framework the board has put in place can, if modified, work to the benefit of both management and shareholders. Paying for exceptional performance is both necessary and desirable.

Luckily, Mr. Biglari has already provided a better template for the board to consider that employs both invested capital and a higher hurdle rate. As chairman and CEO of Western Sizzlin Corp., Mr. Biglari, then a majority owner, designed the following performance bonus structure for Robert Moore, CEO of Western Sizzlin Franchise Corp.:

“Such bonus shall be equal to twenty percent (20%) of Cash Flows in excess of $2.3 million annually as adjusted by a charge of 20% of any incremental reinvestment of capital during each year (“Bonus Compensation”).”

That system made it much more difficult to reap excessive compensation from shareholders. Of course, now that he’s in charge, he wants the bar set lower.
__________

Shane A. Parrish
Noise Free Investments
Farmington, Ct

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT