Ballard adds name to council's marriage resolution

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard on Friday added his name to a City-County Council resolution urging the Indiana General Assembly to reject the proposed same-sex marriage amendment

City-County Resolution 354, co-sponsored by Democrats John Barth, Angela Mansfield and Zach Adamson, and Republican Benjamin Hunter, will be voted on by the full council Monday.

A number of higher education and business groups have spoken out in recent weeks, expressing opposition to altering Indiana’s constitution to define marriage.

“I understand that many people hold differing views on this subject, but Indiana law already defines marriage, and I don’t see the overriding government interest in adding such an amendment to our state’s constitution,” Ballard said in a prepared statement. “Indy is renowned for its ‘Hoosier hospitality’ and working hard to attract new jobs and people to our city.  My hope is that we can continue to work together and focus on those things that make Indy a place where people want to live, work and raise a family.”

State lawmakers will begin considering the same-sex marriage ban in January. Supporters of limiting marriage to one man and one woman say a constitutional amendment is needed to keep the courts from legalizing gay marriage in Indiana. Lawmakers began the lengthy process of placing the ban in the constitution in 2011. The ban won overwhelming support from Democrats and Republicans last time around.

If lawmakers sign off a second time on the legislation, it would be placed on the ballot for voters to consider next November.

Thirty states have constitutional amendments banning legal recognition of same-sex marriage and five others ban it by law.



  • What a waste
    It amazes me that a state "known" for Hoosier Hospitality feels and expresses so much hate for that which they do not fully comprehend. I pity the small minded fools that seek to further injure their neighbors by promoting this agenda, which sadly is already against the law. I feel for all that suffer the opression that these laws submit them to. I love you all, my fellow human beings, even those of you spread such needless hate. Love Thy Neighbor!
  • Thank you, Mayor Ballard
    Mayor Ballard, Your statement demonstrates taht you are a very good person. Thank you.
  • show me
    adolecent suicide rates are high for all categories of youth ... not only homosexuals. however ... I would be interested in reading the proof of either statement ... prove that a person is / or is not born with a genetic / biological disposition toward homosexuality? Additionally ... comparing the sexual practices of the human race to any/all other species on earth does little to reinforce your arguement ... no other species on earth can read or write ... but the ability to read / write exists in only one? So ... ?
  • Hey Nick,
    You're right Nick, that grade school or high school age homosexual that is bullied until the point of exhaustion, where they turn to suicide as their only way out; you're correct, they made that choice to experience that. Makes perfect sense, who wouldn't choose that? Who wouldn't choose to have diminished rights? My question to you Nick, is prove that it isn't natural, prove that a homosexual is not born that way.
    • Mayor Ballard
      Thank you Mayor! "...amendment is needed to keep the courts from legalizing gay marriage..." Because the supporters KNOW its wrong and discriminatory. If banning legal unions were correct or just they wouldn't be worried that it could be overturned in the courts. I would encourage these supporters to read the U.S. Constitution " We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" or perhaps the Pledge of Allegiance "...one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." We are all supposed to have equal rights in the United States; all of us having the same exact rights and responsibilities. When 1 classification does not have the same rights as another it is discrimination. I might also encourage some supporters to review Federal and State law and how those work interpedently and independently of each other. Additionally, perhaps a review of grammar and sentence structure would be in order. So, to sum up, you should be returning to Biology, Civics / Government and English classes. Good luck Gary
    • prove it
      Nick, what proof do you have that people who choose homosexuality are born that way?
      • Biological Fact?
        I'm not sure what biology fact you're referring to, but marriage is not a biological structure. It's actually a religious one, and civic unions are created by law. Homosexuality exists in all species on this Earth, but homophobia only exists in one. People who are homosexual are born that way, and their love is just as equal as heterosexual love. They should be given the same rights in the view of the law as any other legally married couple. You simply cannot take away the rights of a segment of the population just because your religious beliefs don't allow for something that occurs in nature.
      • why are we doing this
        Why at this time in our countries history are we trying to redefine what is biologically a fact,the marriage is between a man and a woman only. What needs to be done is that a National definition of man/woman marriage needs to be defined In the constitution and end of story in state and across the country, forever, with no legal recourse for a minority to change this and force it upon the majority and the natural state of what a man/woman relationship is all about in marriage.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

      2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

      3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

      4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

      5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.