IBJNews

Ballard again targets homestead credit in latest budget proposal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Mayor Greg Ballard will introduce a $1 billion budget for 2014 Monday night that chops the Marion County Sheriff’s spending and once again hinges on a complicated reshuffling of tax revenue.

Ballard’s administration is counting on the City-County Council to boost revenue by $11.5 million by eliminating the homestead property-tax credit, which is an income tax-supported subsidy that benefits some homeowners. (It’s different than the much larger homestead deduction.)

With three Republicans joining the Democratic majority, the council voted 18-11 on July 29 against a phased-in homestead credit elimination. Last year, council leaders rejected a similar proposal that was part of Ballard’s 2013 budget.

Council President Maggie Lewis, a Democrat, said she agreed to sponsor the proposal this time, but she’s not personally sold on it. “It’s budget time, and everything should be on the table,” she said.

Lewis said she also wants to look at one-time measures, such as tapping tax-increment finance revenue, an $80 million fiscal stability fund that helps the city maintain its AAA credit rating, or unspent Rebuild Indy money.

Ballard’s team anticipated a $55 million gap between revenue and spending for 2014. They caught an $8 million break because health insurance premiums stayed flat, and they’re looking for $32.5 million more in spending cuts and new revenue sources.

The rest of the gap would be covered by spending down $25 million of the current general-fund balance.

The proposed cuts are as follows:

— Not funding police and firefighter raises scheduled to take effect in 2014: $5.7 million

— Marion County Sheriff’s Office: $5.4 million

— Marion County Courts: $1 million

— Indianapolis Fire Department: $1 million.

Additional revenue would come from these sources:

— Eliminating the local homestead tax credit, along with expanding the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department property-tax district: $11.5 million

— Charging police and firefighters fees for personal use of their take-home cars: $1.4 million.

Lewis, who was briefed on the budget this week, said she’s concerned about the impact on cops, courts and the sheriff.

She thinks the administration should give police and firefighters their raises. “They signed that contract. I think they should honor that contract.”

Firefighters wouldn’t face layoffs as a result of the department’s budget cut. Chief of Staff Ryan Vaughn said the city will spend the next year studying opportunities for station consolidation, but there will be no layoffs. IFD has an incoming recruit class, which is expected to make up for retirements and reduce overtime expenses.

The deepest cut would fall on the sheriff’s office, an ongoing source of frustration for Ballard. Sheriff John Layton’s budget would go from $111.5 million this year to $108 million.

That includes $2 million that's earmarked for debt service on an emergency communications system, so unless the council finds a way to restore his funding, Layton faces about $5 million in cuts elsewhere. He couldn’t be reached for comment Friday, when Vaughn and Controller Jason Dudich presented an overview of the budget to IBJ.

In an interview Thursday, Ballard said he’s not concerned about the impact of budget cuts. “If people manage appropriately, you won’t see any drop in services,” he said.

The council is scheduled to vote on the budget Oct. 14. “I don’t think they’re going to try to play games with it like they did last year,” Ballard said.

Vaughn acknowledged, though, that he has no idea how the council will react to his third crack at eliminating the homestead credit.

The impact on homeowners ranges from zero for those whose bills are already at the constitutionally mandated 1-percent cap to more than $70, especially in parts of Washington Township. The impact varies in both Democratic and Republican council districts.

Vaughn thinks eliminating the homestead credit makes the county’s tax burden fairer because currently, anyone who pays income taxes but doesn’t own a home sees no benefit. “It’s literally paying my property-tax bill in Washington Township,” he said.

Eliminating the credit would generate $11.5 million in income tax if it’s coupled with an expansion of the IMPD taxing district. The district currently covers the old city limits, but Ballard’s administration is proposing to expand it to the entire county, except Lawrence, Beech Grove, Speedway and Southport.

The current IMPD property-tax levy, $35 million, would apply to a broader base, lowering the tax rate from 36.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation inside the current district to 11.4 cents per $100. Whether homeowners inside the current district see their bills decline and those in the expanded area see bills rise will depend on whether they've already hit the 1-percent cap, Dudich said.

For the city, expanding the district lessens the impact of property-tax caps and would generate another $3 million a year, Dudich said. Other entities inside the old city limits, especially Indianapolis Public Schools, would see the same benefit, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Homes less affordable
    Yes, lets get rid of the tax break that makes home ownership affordable. Surely there is some other way to fund our police department.
  • What about TIFs?
    Yes, what about the TIF revenues? What are they? If we keep putting new projects in TIFs will never grow the property tax base. Why not get a project at the Market Square site that can be developed with free land, but without an $18 million taxpayer subsidy so that its property taxes can go into the general fund to fill some gaps?
  • City Accounting is just lone Major financial defalcation.
    It is criminal for the Ballard administration to ask rank and file taxpayers for anymore money. 1st and foremost START BY reporting 100% of the revenues and stop funding TIFS! Put all assessed valuation of real estate back in --in support of the general fund. Then when you have excess funding consider more TIFS only continue to pay down the current TIFS. Complete lack of integrity not to properly report all tax revenues. Stop with the crony capitalism.
  • OK
    This guy beat who on what??? Thanks IMPD, this is all the luv you get.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT