IBJOpinion

Ballard is right to oppose smoking ban

December 26, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

[Mickey Maurer’s Nov. 30 column] was the second article criticizing Mayor [Greg] Ballard on his position against a stronger non-smoking ban for Indy. As much as I have always admired Maurer as a successful businessman and all the good work he does with his wealth, it has been evident that he stands on the side of political correctness on most issues he writes about. Unfortunately he, like many other business leaders, does not see the forest for the trees.

The smoking ban issue is not really about health. If so, then why not ban everything that is not healthy according to a few people—alcohol, soda pop, Kool-Aid, candy bars, fast food?

While we all desire healthy living for all Americans, are we prepared to accept what will be the next ban? Will it be overeating, long hair, outdoor cooking, listening to music on our patio, mowing our grass on Sundays? Such infringements, like the smoking ban, should be vigorously fought.

The solution to the smoking ban is simple. Let the marketplace decide. As a [Danville] restaurant owner, I can testify that the marketplace does the best job. There are places for both nonsmokers and smokers and they have the choice to make where they want to spend their time and money. If customers are lost due to smoking, then sales will dictate a change in policy. Having gone non-smoking two years ago, my sales have increased and it proved to be a profitable decision that I made [that was] not local-government mandated.

In support of the mayor, it is significant to point out that he served our country as a soldier—protecting our freedoms abroad. Perhaps his experience of being in countries where there are no freedoms, but only tyranny, helped form his present position. We should be grateful for his caution and concern on this issue. It is easy to criticize when the numbers are on your side, but it takes courage and boldness to oppose the popular for what is right for all our citizens.

___________

Dave Byrdwell

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT